Are you quibbling about it being a text message instead of an "email"? Wow. How is it nonconclusive when Dirty Hunter sends a text message to his own daughter indicating that "I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family Fro (sic) 30 years. It's really hard. But don't worry unlike Pop I won't make you give me half your salary," You don't believe that is evidence that Dirty Hunter was paying his father? What you do you think it means? And you think that Joe Biden as VP of the United States would have access to conference call information 20 times? You don't just dial your son's telephone number and jump on a conference call bridge. There are different access codes for each such call. Those have to be sent to the indvidual parties. You also don't think there might be a security risk for the VP to talk to his son while unknown other parties were on the call? It's laugahble.
Are you quibbling about it being a text message instead of an "email"? Wow.Because accuracy matters, even if you clearly believe it doesn't matter at all.
How is it nonconclusive when Dirty Hunter sends a text message to his own daughter indicating that "I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family Fro (sic) 30 years. It's really hard. But don't worry unlike Pop I won't make you give me half your salary," Because it is inconclusive. You don't know the context and you (as well as that idiot Comer) are jumping to conclusions.
You don't believe that is evidence that Dirty Hunter was paying his father? No, it's not evidence of anything. You just want it to be... Again, you don't know the context and/or what precisely Hunter was talking about.
What you do you think it means? I have no idea what it means and neither do you. You are just making up your own reality, as per usual.
And you think that Joe Biden as VP of the United States would have access to conference call information 20 times? You don't just dial your son's telephone number and jump on a conference call bridge. There are different access codes for each such call. Those have to be sent to the indvidual parties. You also don't think there might be a security risk for the VP to talk to his son while unknown other parties were on the call? BS... Hunter's business partner confirmed that Hunter talked to his dad just about every single day. Joe Biden wasn't calling in to a conference call. Hunter just put his mobile phone on speaker to have him say hello to the people he was with at the time. You have no way of knowing if any of the calls were actually made during the time Biden was VP, so again, you are jumping to all sorts of conclusions without knowing the actual facts...
But here's the bottom line; no matter how often Comer repeats the same old BS on TV or on his committee's website, when he was asked if he had any actual evidence against Joe Biden he said "I hope so"... Now that's pathetic!
Bring me actual conclusive evidence against Joe Biden and I'll be the first one to support an impeachment procedure, but what Comer is doing is a fishing expedition, just like the false Benghazi claims against Hillary Clinton and the Hunter Biden laptop charade. It is, and has been for years if not decades, the standard Republican strategy. Make as many claims as you can, no matter if they are true or not, to influence an upcoming election.
