What's silly beyond tolerance is the automatic dismissal of any inconsistency of the evidence as "simple error - nothing to see here". Mrs. Paine wouldn't know what if anything was submitted for fingerprint testing on March 15. And why are there two versions of the CSSS to begin with?
But by the same token, CTers love to paint each and every "inconsistency" with their conspiracy brush. No matter what it is. And, when combining the witness statements and the various official documents connected to the case, there were, indeed, a number of inconsistencies.
The "2-15-63" date written on the Klein's deposit ticket would be yet another one. But that was a
KLEIN'S error, while the "inconsistency" relating to the CSSS document is an error made by the
DALLAS POLICE. So when we discuss just those two items, how can anyone try to say those two "inconsistencies" are related in any way? Reasonably speaking, they can't.
I am kind of curious, though, as to why two different versions of that Crime Scene Search Section document exist.
