Truly's False Roll

[Charles Collins]

Your point being?

Reasons why I think BRW didn’t choose the open window in the cubbyhole (like you indicated that you would have).

[Charles Collins]

Right, so let's have a look at you reasons:

BRW said that he was expecting the others to come back up to the sixth floor to watch the motorcade.

But they didn't agree to squeeze into the cubby hole, or did I miss something?
 
And when they didn't come back up there he decided to go elsewhere to see if he could find them.

So plenty of time to enjoy his lunch, and the view, until they might show up.

Also, the sniper's nest was a pretty tight squeeze even for just one person.

But BRW was super slim and only carried his lunch.

I cannot imagine three of them trying to get in there between the windows and boxes.

Agreed, kind of a straw man you tried to launch there (RE your first reason).

And, apparently, they could open windows as needed, the windows were open on the west side (where they had been working).

Exactly, spreading out, so you just destroyed you own list of arguments.

So, are you trying to argue that BRW would have chosen the sniper’s nest to eat his lunch?

[Richard Smith]

Since your reasons don't work that would have been the obvious choice, wouldn't you agree?

In which we are told that the location for someone to eat lunch in a 1963 building is "obvious."  This despite the person in question testifying under oath to the contrary.  The rabbit hole beckons.  I do wonder if Otto is simply spoofing a contrarian to see how long he can extend discussions. 

[Charles Collins]

Since your reasons don't work that would have been the obvious choice, wouldn't you agree?

The reasons I expressed are perfectly fine. You haven't said anything at all that diminishes them whatsoever, wouldn't you agree?

[Charles Collins]

In which we are told that the location for someone to eat lunch in a 1963 building is "obvious."  This despite the person in question testifying under oath to the contrary.  The rabbit hole beckons.  I do wonder if Otto is simply spoofing a contrarian to see how long he can extend discussions.

Agreed.

[Charles Collins]

Your question makes no sense.

I picked them apart into a list of five and dismissed everyone of them.

Your "reasons" remain nonsense, as I've already explained.

Dismissed only in your mind, wouldn’t you agree.

[Charles Collins]

You have so far providid no counter arguments to my 5 x dismissals.

Translation: you lost the argument.

BTW, as part of your failed argument you failed to explain when BRW concluded that the cobby hole was inappropriately sized?

Only in your own mind, wouldn't you agree?

[Charles Collins]

Wrong, you fail again.

Simply a matter of fact, anybody can check the record.

Any reason you avoided my bonus question?

Only in your own mind, wouldn't you agree?