For WC Supporters

[Louis Earl]

The rifle was old, the ammo was old, the scope was not sighted in well.  While many think it was an easy shot as someone who has shot rifles two bulls eyes at a moving target is never just par for the course.   If you  believe the WC how do you address these issues?  Is it just that he rifle wasn't that old, the ammo wasn't that old, the scope wasn't that out of sight  and it was an easy shot?

Not asking for a discourse or references to testimonly just in a nutshell do you consider these objections easy to overcome?

[Tim Nickerson]

The rifle was old, the ammo was old, the scope was not sighted in well.  While many think it was an easy shot as someone who has shot rifles two bulls eyes at a moving target is never just par for the course.   If you  believe the WC how do you address these issues?  Is it just that he rifle wasn't that old, the ammo wasn't that old, the scope wasn't that out of sight  and it was an easy shot?

Not asking for a discourse or references to testimonly just in a nutshell do you consider these objections easy to overcome?

Two bull eyes? Where do you get that from? The scope was out of alignment when the authorities checked it. It is not known if it was out of alignment when Oswald fired the shots. The rifle and the ammo were not that old.