Oswald Probably Did It

[Tim Nickerson]

As I said... word game.

Btw.. when you posted your comment, I was re-writing my previous post.

Better but still not entirely accurate. I edited my own post as well.

[Martin Weidmann]

Better but still not entirely accurate. I edited my own post as well.

Better but still not entirely accurate = Not according to your wishes, right?

The fact remains that Bentley mentioned a credit card and a drivers license when he was asked what was in the wallet.

Why would he mention those items if they weren't really there? Did he just make it up?

[Bill Chapman]

I am surprised that you got anyone to play your silly game.  Your motive is clear and we have seen this same ?black or white? logical fallacy repeatedly.  If one cannot show compelling evidence that someone other than Oswald did it, then Oswald did it, right?  WRONG!  It is not necessary to provide an alternate shooter to show that Oswald was not the shooter and the burden of proof that Oswald was the shooter rests on those arguing that he was.   Furthermore, since we both know the evidence, have made up our minds, and there is no possible way that either one of us could sway the other, your post is futile.

If one cannot show compelling evidence that someone other than Oswald did it, then Oswald did it, right?  WRONG!
>Show us where I claim that little gem.

[Bill Chapman]

If one cannot show compelling evidence that someone other than Oswald did it, then Oswald did it, right?  WRONG!

>Show us where I ever claimed that little gem.

[Larry Baldwin]

If one cannot show compelling evidence that someone other than Oswald did it, then Oswald did it, right?  WRONG!
>Show us where I claim that little gem.

Why should I?  I asked a question.  But don't play stupid now, it is probably what you meant.  I am 100% certain of that (that you probably meant it). 

[Wesley Johnson]

The point is no one is going to read run-on endless paragraphs. Learn to separate your thoughts.

I don't have to prove LHO's innocence. You have to prove his guilt. Well?

Funny. I looked at one of your posts and you ramble on forever. Learn to separate your thoughts. Actually since this is not a court of law, neither one of us is compelled to prove anything.

[John Iacoletti]

Funny. I looked at one of your posts and you ramble on forever. Learn to separate your thoughts. Actually since this is not a court of law, neither one of us is compelled to prove anything.

True enough, but don't you feel like you need good reasons to believe the things you believe?

[Martin Weidmann]

Funny. I looked at one of your posts and you ramble on forever. Learn to separate your thoughts. Actually since this is not a court of law, neither one of us is compelled to prove anything.

Actually since this is not a court of law, neither one of us is compelled to prove anything.

So true... as long as it is understood that all concerned are merely expressing opinions rather than making claims like;

I would love to have Oswald in the hot seat at court. At the end of it, I would pin the bag, the rifle, the revolver, the bullet, the fragments, the shell casings, the documents, proving Oswald's ownership of the weapons, and the eye witness testimonies, right to little old Oswaldovich's head. And after the defense, blew all the smoke and put up all the mirrors, the jury would see that they had zero, physical, or ballistic evidence to support their defense. It is hilarious.

Gee... Wesley, did you write that?

Btw.. Any idead why LNs are constantly asking for proof for just about everything?