Martin I don't know how much more clear I can be to you about why I believe Oswald did it. What do you want me to do? Explain every test that was performed, every piece of paper that was analyzed? I believe the evidence gathered to be accurate. I have read most or all of the same material you have. I just don't believe it shows Oswald did not do it. You guys question every little detail. It is amazing. Are you seriously telling me that you have never had any thought about who might have been behind the assassination if the evidence against Oswald is not accurate? I don't believe you. I will ask you again, if you are right about the evidence who do you think was behind it?
Martin I don't know how much more clear I can be to you about why I believe Oswald did it. So, Mark was right. You have nothing to offer to the discussion.
I believe the evidence gathered to be accurate. I have read most or all of the same material you have. I just don't believe it shows Oswald did not do it. If anybody claims that the evidence shows that Oswald didn't do it, I would disagree with him. But nobody is claiming that.
You guys question every little detail. It is amazing. It's very simple. The whole thing happened in just one way, which means that basically all pieces of the puzzle should fall into place if the version of the narrative you are telling is the correct one. Here, those pieces simply do not all fall into place but, even worse, you've got important pieces missing and others that do not fit at all. Believing the official narrative nevertheless is faith and not reason.
I'm calling BS on you here Martin. Cters have always used that quote as an indication that LBJ was behind it and there was a conspiracy. Get real. You can't even admit that? Fascinating.
Well you know all there is to know about BS, so for me there isn't anything to add except perhaps that your constant CT bashing is getting very tiresome.