Handwriting authentication

[Bill Chapman]

Your opinion is based on the similarity of one letter.....  The capital "D"...   That's not very conclusive, or convincing.

It's a start and that's what I'm doing
Call it a feasibility study

You have ignored the far more telling item, which is not only in the way he writes the 'T' in 'Texas', but the way that his cursive capital 'T' in two other words display the exact same odd-looking 'T' as on the MO. Apparently Oswald missed the 'cross your tees' memo

[John Iacoletti]

The money order found in Virginia cannot be associated with any specific Klein’s order.

[Tim Nickerson]

Tim,

Conclusions by experts are always questionable to some degree. In many cases the two sides will present their own experts who will provide completely contradictory conclusions about the same evidence.

That said, the conclusions they made on original documents were not the subject of this conversation. An expert can be a thousand times right on other original documents and still be wrong on a non-original. And besides, can you explain how an original signature on an original document can be authenticated to having been written by a now dead person?

And finally, whether you say that their conclusions about the Kleins' documents are "minorly" or "highly" questionable, you're only talking about the degree of questionability. In either case the bottom line is that those conclusions are in fact still questionable! Agreed?

i disagree that their conclusions are questionable. Particularly in light of the money order.

[Martin Weidmann]

i disagree that their conclusions are questionable. Particularly in light of the money order.

Now you are contradicting yourself. Earlier you said;

The conclusions of the FBI on the handwriting seen in the photograph that they made from microfilm are minorly questionable, not highly questionable.  They also made conclusions on original documents. Those conclusions are not questionable at all.

How can their conclusions be "minor questionable" yet not questionable at all?

[Tim Nickerson]

Now you are contradicting yourself. Earlier you said;

How can their conclusions be "minor questionable" yet not questionable at all?

I changed my mind. They would be minorly questionable on their own. When taken together with the money order, they are not questionable at all.

[Martin Weidmann]

I changed my mind. They would be minorly questionable on their own. When taken together with the money order, they are not questionable at all.

Amazing.... I've never before seen you this much all over the place.

Talk about trying to make evidence fit by making assumptions and ignoring facts.

[Walt Cakebread]

That's how you build a mountain of evidence...

That's how you build a mountain of evidence lies...

[Walt Cakebread]

Horse crap...especially when you never seem to cite any source of your horse crap.

If the carcano was not the murder weapon ( and it wasn't).....then who cares if it was ordered by Lee Oswald or Mickey mouse?