Unless you are suggesting that JFK committed suicide, the options are that Oswald did it or a ton of evidence was manufactured to make it look like he did. You are constantly implying the latter. Which would be a conspiracy. There is a mountain of evidence confirming that Oswald did it. That is why some CTers allege the evidence was planted. To frame Oswald for the crime. The fact that this evidence doesn't satisfy the subjective criteria of a contrarian loon doesn't change that. Again, the case against Oswald has been publicly known and available for nearly six decades. You know that evidence. Why do you keep asking me for it? Do you think I have evidence that wasn't available to law enforcement and the WC? You are constantly confusing your own impossible subjective standard of proof on the topic with facts and evidence. Every contrarian doesn't have to be convinced for something to be a fact.
FACT: Oswald did it.
FACT: there is no credible evidence of anyone else being involved. After nearly 60 years, you can't and won't even articulate any counternarrative. That speaks volumes as to the lack of evidence of any conspiracy.
the options are that Oswald did it or a ton of evidence was manufactured to make it look like he did. What "ton of evidence" would that be?
There is a mountain of evidence confirming that Oswald did it.If that's true, why do you constantly fail to present that evidence?
Again, the case against Oswald has been publicly known and available for nearly six decades. You know that evidence. You mean the "evidence" that doesn't actually prove what is being alleged?
Why do you keep asking me for it? Because you continue not to produce it. You make all sorts of claims about a paper bag, Oswald being on the 6th floor and going down the TSBD stairs within 75 seconds after the last shot, and much more, without actually ever producing a shred of conclusive evidence for it.
Do you think I have evidence that wasn't available to law enforcement and the WC? Well, you must have, because the WC never actually claimed there was any evidence that Oswald was on the 6th floor of the TSBD when Kennedy passed by. They just said he was. Yet, you claim there is such evidence. So, where is it?
You are constantly confusing your own impossible subjective standard of proof on the topic with facts and evidence.What "facts and evidence"? After about six months of asking, I finally gave up asking for the evidence you said existed that Oswald was on the 6th floor of the TSBD at 12:30 on 11/22/63 and that he ran down the stairs, unseen, within 75 seconds after the last shot. Are you now still claiming that such evidence exists?
FACT: Oswald did it. A fact can be proven. So, prove it or it isn't a fact
FACT: there is no credible evidence of anyone else being involved. That's not necessarily true. Within the body of evidence that the WC provided, there is enough to make a circumstantial case for a conspiracy, but you will never accept any of it.
After nearly 60 years, you can't and won't even articulate any counternarrative. Don't have to...
That speaks volumes as to the lack of evidence of any conspiracy. No it doesn't.
