A time to receive and give (CE399)

[Andrew Mason]

Here is the whole thing:

The bullet going "obliquely along the direction of the femur" fits Mason's silly notion that the bullet from Kennedy's throat travel forward and passed-without-striking (get this) Connally's left torso and thus entered the left thigh from behind.

With Connally turned right as he is up to z200 and with his left leg out a bit to the side (natural) the right to left path through JFK's neck goes directly there - to the left thigh. 

Dr. Shires testified: (6 H 106):

"Mr. SPECTER. What size bullet would it take to create the punctate hole which
you described in the thigh?
Dr. SHIRES. This would depend entirely on the angle and the speed and
weight of the bullet. For example, a small missile on a tangent may create a
surprisingly large defect. A large bullet with fast or a relatively slow velocity
will create the same defect."

This is in contrast to the SBT scenario that the bullet entered the thigh after slapping off the right wrist.

Perhaps you could explain how "slapping" off the right wrist results in the bullet going through the french cuff causing a jagged long tear:

and going down and to the left rather than away from the point of contact.  Keep in mind that the damage to the right radius bone was to the right side of the bone not the inner left side.

[Dan O'meara]

I'm not sure if this article by Aguilar and Thompson has come up yet, but the only question it leaves unanswered is - when was CE399 introduced into the chain of custody?:

https://history-matters.com/essays/frameup/EvenMoreMagical/EvenMoreMagical.htm

[Mitch Todd]

I agree with the comment that "Shires and the x-rays tell a different story". I am not sure why Dr. Shaw's or even Dr. Gregory's comments are all that important. Dr. Shires had the closest and longest look at the thigh wound and x-rays.

In my view, the most significant issue is the location of the metal piece that remained in the thigh.

Dr. Gregory thought the metal piece appeared just below the skin but it is not clear what he based that on.

Oh, but yes it is clear. And we've been through all this before over at a.a.jfk, if you recall. It starts with a Dr Jack Reynolds, the Parkland radiologist responsible for examining the Connally's X-rays  in the late fall of 1963. Reynolds reported that the fragment was 8mm from the surface of the skin, not buried in the femur.  Gregory read those x-rays the same way. So did Shaw. In fact, every physician that I know of who've examined the thigh x-rays have stated that the thigh fragment is near the surface, except for Shires. The explanation given by the HSCA FPP was that Shires was confused by an artifact in one of the x-rays that overlies the image of the femur. Ultimately, you have Shires' opinion versus basically everyone else's.

Further, had a bullet hit Connally's thigh hard enough to drive a fragment deep into the bone, it would have caused noticeable damage to the bone. No such injury is evident in the x-rays, the of the operative records, the medical testimony, or anywhere else. There just isn't a case for a fragment driven into the bone.

Dr. Shires had debrided the wound down to the region of the femur. This involved cleaning the wound and removing dead tissue. I am not sure why he would be removing dead tissue down as far as the femur unless the bullet had travelled that far.

Which doesn't even begin to prove anything one way or the other about how far in the fragment was.

Dr. Shires always maintained that the metal piece was embedded in the femur.  That metal piece shows up on both the anterior-posterior and lateral views at the same location relative to the femur (CE694, 695, 696).

Whatever Shires claimed, and for how long, every other physician who's studied those x-rays state that the fragment is not in the femur, but a few mm from the surface. Also, if you notice, and you don't even have to look carefully, there are multiple little bright, fragment-like spots on those x-rays. So which is the real fragment and which are artifacts?

[Dan O'meara]

Another thing to note about Andrew's model is Connally's head is far closer to the side of the limo than JFK's
In reality JFK (in any photo I've seen of the motorcade) is jammed into the corner of his seat with his right arm resting on the edge of the limo, while Connally is sat further away from the edge of the limo:



If Connally is positioned to replicate the image above in Andrew's model it would bring his right armpit nicely into line with a bullet fired from the SN and exiting JFK's throat.

[Andrew Mason]

Another thing to note about Andrew's model is Connally's head is far closer to the side of the limo than JFK's.

That is because I am basing their positions at the time, according to the evidence, first shot occurred (z190-200), not how they were positioned 20 minutes earlier.  The zfilm shows how they were positioned at that time:

JBC is turned to the right.  Since the seat back prevents him just turning if he is leaning against it, he had to lean forward a bit and then turn his shoulders pivoting on his right shoulder.  This appears to have moved his midline slightly to the right of centre of the seat.

If Connally is positioned to replicate the image above in Andrew's model it would bring his right armpit nicely into line with a bullet fired from the SN and exiting JFK's throat.

Only if JBC was sitting on the left edge of his seat over the drive shaft so that his midline was 12-13 inches left of JFK's midline.

[Dan O'meara]

That is because I am basing their positions at the time, according to the evidence, first shot occurred (z190-200), not how they were positioned 20 minutes earlier.  The zfilm shows how they were positioned at that time:

JBC is turned to the right.  Since the seat back prevents him just turning if he is leaning against it, he had to lean forward a bit and then turn his shoulders pivoting on his right shoulder.  This appears to have moved his midline slightly to the right of centre of the seat. Only if JBC was sitting on the left edge of his seat over the drive shaft so that his midline was 12-13 inches left of JFK's midline.

I can only post actual photographic evidence of the relative sitting positions of JFK and Connally.
The ludicrous sitting positions you have in your model are based on nothing but your futile attempt to bolster your truly bizarre theory. They have no basis in reality and have zero evidentiery support.

Only if JBC was sitting...12-13 inches left of JFK's midline.

A bit like the photo posted above 

[Andrew Mason]

I can only post actual photographic evidence of the relative sitting positions of JFK and Connally.
The ludicrous sitting positions you have in your model are based on nothing but your futile attempt to bolster your truly bizarre theory. They have no basis in reality and have zero evidentiery support.

I am puzzled that you think a photo taken 20 minutes before the first shot is a more accurate portrayal of their relative positions than a photo taken just before:


or at the time of the first shot:


I know that you think TE Moore, Betzner, Phil Willis and Linda Willis as to the time of the first shot were wrong; and that the witnesses who said the head shot was the last shot were wrong.  That's fine. But their evidence is consistent and it is real and capable of being correct.  I disagree that this evidence carries no weight.  Based on that evidence a reasonable conclusion can be reached that the first shot was just before z202 and the above photos show the relative positions of the two men at that time. At that time there is not 13 inches lateral distance between the midlines of the two men. 

Only if JBC was sitting...12-13 inches left of JFK's midline.

A bit like the photo posted above 

That photo was taken from a film made by Dave Powers in the QM. He is in the middle of the car so naturally JBC and JFK would both be seen even if JBC was directly in front of JFK.

[Andrew Mason]

I can only post actual photographic evidence of the relative sitting positions of JFK and Connally.
The ludicrous sitting positions you have in your model are based on nothing but your futile attempt to bolster your truly bizarre theory. They have no basis in reality and have zero evidentiary support.

The relative seating positions can be readily determined from a 3D model.  The trajectory from the SN is what is critical. This is my rather primitive but accurate 3D model that I did in Sketchup using a scale map of Dealey Plaza:




The trajectory is very similar to that which the WC considered when they made their 3D model of Dealey Plaza and placed the limousine at the point where they considered the evidence showed that the first shot occurred (a position that I suggest was correct):