It does not work that way. You have to fit all this evidence with the rest of the evidence.
We have evidence that a bullet was found at Parkland. The bullet that makes its way from Tomlinson-Wright (TW) to Johnsen-Rowley-Todd (JRT) is claimed by JRT to be a bullet that was fired by the murder weapon.
TW supposedly claims that the bullet they had and handed over was not a bullet from the murder weapon.
JRT's evidence fits with the rest of the entire case. TW's "evidence" implies that evidence was deliberately falsified by JRT because this could not be a random error. That bullet could not have been substituted by carelessness or inadvertence. IT HAD BEEN FIRED FROM C2766!
So to believe TW, one has to conclude, without any evidence to corroborate, that JRT were involved in a conspiracy to plant evidence without any evidence at all of how that could have been done let alone that the Secret Service at its highest level was involved.
is claimed by JRT to be a bullet that was fired by the murder weapon. This is simply not true. Johnsen and Rowley failed to identify the bullet and neither man as well as Todd could possibly have known which rifle fired that bullet.
JRT's evidence fits with the rest of the entire case. Not really, but it wouldn't have been surprising if it did if the entire case was a fabrication to begin with.
TW's "evidence" implies that evidence was deliberately falsified by JRT because this could not be a random error. That bullet could not have been substituted by carelessness or inadvertence. IT HAD BEEN FIRED FROM C2766!I don't think that anybody disputes this. The real question that should be asked is
when was it fired by C2766?So to believe TW, one has to conclude, without any evidence to corroborate, that JRT were involved in a conspiracy to plant evidence without any evidence at all of how that could have been done let alone that the Secret Service at its highest level was involved. And yet, we still have Wright on record as saying the bullet he was given by Tomlinson was pointed, which CE399 clearly isn't. We have SA Odum denying that he ever showed CE399 to Tomlinson and Wright which means the FBI lied to the WC in CE2011. And we don't have a shred of evidence to confirm that CE399 was ever in Parkland Hospital, as there is no chain of custody for it.
I started my proposed scenario by saying that there had to have been people in high places (who could control the investigation and the evidence) involved for the conspiracy to work. If you are not willing to even accept the possibility that some Secret Service agents were involved you will never be able to look at this case objectively.
But let's take a closer look at this case;
There is not a shred of evidence that there was a rifle in Ruth Paine's garage on 11/21/63
There is no evidence that supports the assumption that Oswald brought the MC rifle into the TSBD on 11/22/63, but there are two witnesses who described the bag Oswald carried in such a way that it was clearly to small to conceal a broken down rifle.
There is no evidence that Oswald was actually on the 6th floor of the TSBD when the shots were fired.
There is no evidence that Oswald came down the stairs within 75 seconds after the last shot and managed to do so unnoticed by anybody, despite the fact that several women on the 4th floor were close to the stairs at that time.
There is no evidence that confirms that the MC rifle found on the 6th floor had actually been fired that day
There is no chain of custody for the bullet CE399 that confirms it was indeed the bullet found by Tomlinson at Parkland hospital.
Even Dr. Humes, when asked during his testimony, stated he did not believe CE399 could have gone through Kennedy and Connally and come out is the condition it is in.
The rifle was used to fired 100 test bullets and not a single one came even close the being in the same condition CE399 is in.
There is no evidence to confirm that the bullet fragments given to Frazier at the Secret Service garage actually came from the Presidential limo. Frazier was simply told they did.
There is serious doubt about the so-called Walker bullet now in evidence as CE573 being the bullet that was actually recovered from General Walker's home.
Some case!
The bottom line is obvious; either Oswald did it alone or there was a conspiracy. Those are the two options. When you rule out the possibility of a conspiracy simply because you can't imagine how that could have worked or who was behind it, you are left with only one option, which is that regardless of what the evidence (or lack thereof) tells you Oswald needs to be a lone assassin. The possibility of a conspiracy was never seriously investigated simply because it did not fit with Hoover's and perhaps LBJ's agenda. That's a hell of a way to conduct an investigation....