Breaking News: Oliver Stone Used Fake Oswald Handbills - Twice

[Fred Litwin]

Yes, 544 Camp Street was stamped on a few Corliss Lamont pamphlets. That stamp did not include Oswald's name.

The handbills that Oswald handed out on the streets of New Orleans was NOT stamped 544 Camp Street.

I strongly suggest you actually read my posts. All of this is in those posts.

fred

[Jon Banks]

Either Oswald stamped the Camp St address on the handbills or someone else did it.

Neither scenario erases the fact that Oswald was somehow associated with an address linked to rightwingers and anti-Castro activists.

[Fred Litwin]

I guess you are determined not to read my posts. Oswald never stamped 544 Camp Street on his handbills. I challenge you to find one.

fred

[John Iacoletti]

What difference does it make which particular items had the Camp St address stamped on?

[Fred Litwin]

If it doesn't make a difference, then why did Oliver Stone use a fake handbill twice? And why are people
like James DiEugenio denying.

I answer the question in my posts, which I assume you haven't read.

fred

[Richard Smith]

Stone hasn't been relevant in decades.  I didn't even realize he was still alive.  I do give him some credit for at least questioning the government even if he makes a fool of himself.  Something most of his kindred will no longer do.  In fact, they advocate censorship and worse for anyone who dares to question any official explanation. 

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Stone hasn't been relevant in decades.  I didn't even realize he was still alive.  I do give him some credit for at least questioning the government even if he makes a fool of himself.  Something most of his kindred will no longer do.  In fact, they advocate censorship and worse for anyone who dares to question any official explanation.

Stone doesn't question US government policies, he's hostile to them. Every single time. He uses the same thinking on American foreign policy that he does with the JFK assassination: that is, conclusion first - a conspiracy happened/the US is wrong - and then finds facts to support those views.

It's a judgment first, facts second world view. Is there a single US policy that he doesn't think was wrong? Just one? He thinks that if the US elected Henry Wallace as president in 1948 that the Cold War wouldn't have happened. Even though Wallace himself later admitted that his views about Stalin and Moscow were completely wrong, that he was duped by the Soviets (several of his campaign advisers were actual Soviet agents including one John Abt; yes, Oswald's Abt). Likewise, is there a single people piece of evidence that he thinks implicates Oswald? Just one? Answers, no and no.

[Richard Smith]

Stone doesn't question US government policies, he's hostile to them. Every single time. He uses the same thinking on American foreign policy that he does with the JFK assassination: that is, conclusion first - a conspiracy happened/the US is wrong - and then finds facts to support those views.

It's a judgment first, facts second world view. Is there a single US policy that he doesn't think was wrong? Just one? Is there a single people of evidence that he thinks implicates Oswald? Just one? Answers, no and no.

I'm not saying that I agree with any of his opinions (or even care what they are) just that in these days it is refreshing for someone to still question the government.  In the old days, leftists were advocates for free speech and protested wars.  They no longer do that.  In fact, they are among the most ardent supporters of censorship and endless war.