The fact that after almost 60 years, there is still absolutely no evidence of conspiracy, not one group has been named and no other shooter has been named.
After the cumulative evidence in hundreds of CT books and thousands of internet posts which are all constantly combing through every written word in the WCR and the 26 volumes and the further research of interviewing or investigating or muckraking decent people and there is still no evidence of any organisation behind the crime, no evidence of any evidence manipulation and no evidence of an alternate shooter or shooters.
Therefore, "based on the evidence" provided by almost 60 years of intense and at times desperate conspiracy research we can only conclude that there was no conspiracy.
And the end result for any sane person can only be that 1 man took his rifle to work and shot the President, A crime solved by the end of the very first weekend.
The fact that after almost 60 years, there is still absolutely no evidence of conspiracy,There's also isn't conclusive evidence that is persuasive enough to convince a majority of the people that Oswald acted alone.
All you've got is a highly contrived story that leaves way too many basic questions unanswered for something that is supposed to be a simple murder.
Your entire argument is disingenuous as no outsider has ever had access to the physical evidence or had any legal power to investigate this case properly.
Even the HSCA found the investigation by the Warren Commission and the FBI into a possible conspiracy seriously flawed.
And the end result for any sane person can only be that 1 man took his rifle to work and shot the President,Nope, it's the easy solution for those who are too shallow to dig deeper, are simply to superficial to see through the charade that is the official narrative or just can not deal with the possibility that their Government lied to them. And then of course there are the trolls who will make all sorts of bogus claims and run away when they are challenged.
So even though you live and breathe to discredit any and all investigations concluding that Oswald was the solitary gunman, you are pretending to be a fence sitter, nice!
Where did you get the notion that I want to discredit all the investigations, when I actually don't? Do I feel that the most important investigation (the WC) was seriously flawed? Yes. Do I think Dallas police and the FBI dropped the ball in their handling of the evidence and investigation? Sure. But I have no problem with most of the evidence the investigations produced. I do, however, rather frequently, have a massive problem with the flawed and sometimes utterly false conclusions based on that evidence by zealots like you.
I'm not pretending to be anything. I don't pretend to "know" all the ins and outs of this case and throw "learn the evidence" BS around nor do I pretend to know better than others what the actual "truth" really is. That person would be you. You are far better at pretence than I even can, will and want to be.
What, the information that you believe that leads to a conspiracy? 
JohnM
So you don't even comprehend my remark.... Wow!
