Did Marina have a reason to claim the MC rifle belonged to Lee?

[John Iacoletti]

Besides advertising the "40 inch Carcano with scope" in American Rifleman in 1963,
here's 2 Kleins ads advertising the "40 inch Carcano with scope" from Guns Magazine from the November 1963 and December 1963 issues.

Just because they advertised one doesn’t mean they sold any like that. Especially prior to it being advertised.

[John Mytton]

Just because they advertised one doesn’t mean they sold any like that.

Yeah, you're probably right, Kleins obviously didn't have a clue on what to include in their ads.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Yeah, you're probably right, Kleins obviously didn't have a clue on what to include in their ads.

JohnM

Well, they advertised a rifle that they no longer had in stock.....

[John Mytton]

You are not Oswald's defense attorney despite being here night and day railing against every piece of evidence against him and entertaining every baseless counter explanation.

And there he goes ad hom again..

How is that an ad hom? Or do you seriously consider that you are Oswald's defence attorney?

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Well, they advertised a rifle that they no longer had in stock.....

How do you know what rifles Kleins had in stock?

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

How is that an ad hom? Or do you seriously consider that you are Oswald's defence attorney?

JohnM

Why do you always want to talk about other things than the case? Is there a reason for that?

[Martin Weidmann]

How do you know what rifles Kleins had in stock?

JohnM

Well, they didn't sent (if they sent one at all) the 36" rifle ordered by Hidell.

Why would they sent (if they did) a 40" rifle if they still had the 36" rifle in stock?

It isn't rocket science....

[John Mytton]

Why do you always want to talk about other things than the case?

How is the discussion about what would constitute Oswald's defence be classified as "other things"?

JohnM