Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Walker Case  (Read 28791 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #96 on: July 06, 2023, 12:27:17 AM »
Advertisement
And attempting murder of another man. After all this is a thread titled “The Walker Case.”   8)

Yes, you are so right Charles!
In fact the Warren Commission made the Walker Note their "Number 1 Exhibit"!



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #96 on: July 06, 2023, 12:27:17 AM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #97 on: July 06, 2023, 12:30:16 AM »
No, there's a mountain of "real evidence" that was presented by TWO different investigations a decade and a half apart, the fact that you don't accept it is your problem.

JohnM

The appeal to authority fallacy.

"Evidence" presented by two investigations is like evidence presented by a prosecutor who does not allow a defense counsel to challenge it. It only has propaganda value.
« Last Edit: July 06, 2023, 08:43:05 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3771
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #98 on: July 06, 2023, 12:30:51 AM »
Yes, you are so right Charles!
In fact the Warren Commission made the Walker Note their "Number 1 Exhibit"!



JohnM

If I remember correctly, Marina was their first witness. If so, that would make sense.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #98 on: July 06, 2023, 12:30:51 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #99 on: July 06, 2023, 12:36:47 AM »
The appeal to authority fallacy.

"Evidence" presented by two investigations is like evidence presented by a prosecutor who does not allow a defense counsel challenge it. It only has propaganda value.

And beyond The HSCA confirming "Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at Kennedy. The second and third shots Oswald fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President", as you previously argued the second investigation(HSCA) came to the conclusion there was a possible conspiracy, that doesn't sound like they(The HCSA) were relying on "propaganda value"!

JohnM
« Last Edit: July 06, 2023, 12:42:49 AM by John Mytton »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #100 on: July 06, 2023, 01:09:17 AM »
JohnM

Martin’s post said nothing about anybody planning to use the Neeley street background as a template for fake backyard photos. Maybe you need to read it again, more slowly.
« Last Edit: July 06, 2023, 01:13:54 AM by John Iacoletti »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #100 on: July 06, 2023, 01:09:17 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #101 on: July 06, 2023, 01:11:15 AM »
No, there's a mountain of "real evidence" that was presented by TWO different investigations a decade and a half apart,

LOL.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #102 on: July 06, 2023, 01:12:16 AM »
Yes, you are so right Charles!
In fact the Warren Commission made the Walker Note their "Number 1 Exhibit"!

“The Walker Note”. LOL.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #103 on: July 06, 2023, 01:13:27 AM »
And beyond The HSCA confirming "Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at Kennedy. The second and third shots Oswald fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President"

“Confirming”. LOL.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #103 on: July 06, 2023, 01:13:27 AM »