The Walker Case

[Charles Collins]

Are you aware that this is third-hand hearsay in an anonymously written letter?

Are you aware that Don McElroy said it was he and not Norvell who found and picked up the Walker bullet?

It is an official FBI report that the WC asked for, received, and accepted into the record.

[Jon Banks]

Again, Marina’s testimony definitely links LHO to the crime. The note, the photos, and the bullet recovered from Walker’s house are all highly probative evidence that links LHO to the crime. And the evidence all supports one another.

I'm content with viewing LHO as a potential suspect in the Walker shooting based on her testimony.

But I also stand by my view that there's no evidence that places Oswald at the scene of the crime on April 10th 1963 because there's no evidence.

[John Iacoletti]

There is no proof that Oswald wrote the letter?  It was found among his possessions. 

Wrong again, “Richard”. It was (supposedly) found in a Russian “book of helpful instructions” on Ruth Paine’s bookshelf.

[Charles Collins]

I'm content with viewing LHO as a potential suspect in the Walker shooting based on her testimony.

But I also stand by my view that there's no evidence that places Oswald at the scene of the crime on April 10th 1963 because there's no evidence.

But I also stand by my view that there's no evidence that places Oswald at the scene of the crime on April 10th 1963 because there's no evidence.


You have been shown the evidence over and over and over again. It does place LHO at the crime scene. You can believe otherwise if you want. But claiming that there is no evidence is flat out false.

[Jon Banks]

Wrong again, “Richard”. It was (supposedly) found in a Russian “book of helpful instructions” on Ruth Paine’s bookshelf.

She brought the book to the Secret Service with Marina's other belongings and they found the note in the book.

Not saying it was planted but there were plenty of opportunities to do so under those circumstances.

[Jon Banks]

But I also stand by my view that there's no evidence that places Oswald at the scene of the crime on April 10th 1963 because there's no evidence.


You have been shown the evidence over and over and over again. It does place LHO at the crime scene. You can believe otherwise if you want. But claiming that there is no evidence is flat out false.

Base on your response, I don't think you understand the differences between physical and metaphysical evidence 

It requires no belief or speculation on my part to acknowledge that direct evidence connecting LHO to the crime scene doesn't exist or has never been found.

[John Iacoletti]

That’s your very biased opinion. Sorry but you would be very unlikely to serve on the jury based on your bias.

The biased person is the one who thinks an unsigned, undated note in Russian that doesn’t mention Walker or shooting must be about shooting Walker.

[John Iacoletti]

The conspiracy theorists or those who absurdly claim "show me where I said I was a conspiracy theorist" go all out to defend a person who defected to the enemy at the height of the Cold War and when rejected, hacked into his own wrist which caused massive blood loss and required stitches to repair, the same guy who in a letter to his brother Robert said he was willing to KILL any American, ANY American, the same guy who while in the marines shot himself in the elbow. He also hit his wife!

Is this rant supposed to be evidence that he killed the president or took a shot at Walker?