A question about Oswald

[Charles Collins]

More morphing memories....

It still doesn't make any sense. What picture is he talking about? And even if he is told to "drop everything", how would that be enough to discontinue an examination of a print he allegedly found on the rifle. He was told to turn over all the evidence to the FBI, that same night, but according to his WC testimony he did not follow that instruction and held back the evidence card with the print.

Apart for anything else, as a forensic officer he must have understood the significance of a print found on the alleged murder weapon, yet he does nothing and keeps it in his desk drawer for days.... really?

The words in “No More Silence” are Carl Day’s words. Not Larry Sneed’s or anyone else’s. You made a claim that Day was told to turn over all the evidence. Who do you think told him that? And cite your source.

[Richard Smith]

 

Apart for anything else, as a forensic officer he must have understood the significance of a print found on the alleged murder weapon, yet he does nothing and keeps it in his desk drawer for days.... really?

Investigations take months or even years.  You are stupidly claiming because Day didn't report the print immediately that it must mean that he somehow fabricated evidence in the assassination of the president of the United States and brought it to light after the suspect was dead.  Risking his own career and prison to frame a dead man for a crime that the authorities were already satisfied he committed. LOL.  This is comedy gold.

[Martin Weidmann]

Investigations take months or even years.  You are stupidly claiming because Day didn't report the print immediately that it must mean that he somehow fabricated evidence in the assassination of the president of the United States and brought it to light after the suspect was dead.  Risking his own career and prison to frame a dead man for a crime that the authorities were already satisfied he committed. LOL.  This is comedy gold.

Investigations take months or even years.

Not when the suspect is killed within 48 hours in the basement of the police station

You are stupidly claiming because Day didn't report the print immediately that it must mean that he somehow fabricated evidence in the assassination of the president of the United States and brought it to light after the suspect was dead.  Risking his own career and prison to frame a dead man for a crime that the authorities were already satisfied he committed.

You're an idiot who can not deal with the known facts and constantly keeps on repeating pathetic made up strawman arguments which have already been debunked.

It's ironic that you keep fighting so hard against the possibility of a conspiracy in the Kennedy case while at the same time supporting a guy who claims the entire Government, all the courts, prosecutors and God knows who else is conspiring against him.

[Richard Smith]

Investigations take months or even years.

Not when the suspect is killed within 48 hours in the basement of the police station

You are stupidly claiming because Day didn't report the print immediately that it must mean that he somehow fabricated evidence in the assassination of the president of the United States and brought it to light after the suspect was dead.  Risking his own career and prison to frame a dead man for a crime that the authorities were already satisfied he committed.

You're an idiot who can not deal with the known facts and constantly keeps on repeating pathetic made up strawman arguments which have already been debunked.

It's ironic that you keep fighting so hard against the possibility of a conspiracy in the Kennedy case while at the same time supporting a guy who claims the entire Government, all the courts, prosecutors and God knows who else is conspiring against him.

Isn't it late in "Europa"?  LOL.  I've never suggested that there couldn't be a conspiracy in the JFK assassination.  There is simply no credible evidence.  If you want to accept the "official" story that the current US government and justice system is not corrupt, then knock yourself out, but the fact that I leave open the possibility of governmental abuse means that I have an open mind on the subject.  Rather than acting like a robot and entertaining only those narratives that I wish to be true. 

[John Iacoletti]

Rather than acting like a robot and entertaining only those narratives that I wish to be true.

That is exactly what you do with your “Oswald did it” narrative.

[John Iacoletti]

The words in “No More Silence” are Carl Day’s words. Not Larry Sneed’s or anyone else’s. You made a claim that Day was told to turn over all the evidence. Who do you think told him that? And cite your source.

CE 3145, p.7:

“Lt. DAY stated he received instructions from Chief of Police JESSE B. CURRY, Dallas Police Department, Dallas, Texas, to turn over all of the evidence collected that he was examining, which related to LEE HARVEY OSWALD, to the FBI shortly before midnight on November 22, 1963.”

[Martin Weidmann]

That is exactly what you do with your “Oswald did it” narrative.

 

[Charles Collins]

CE 3145, p.7:

“Lt. DAY stated he received instructions from Chief of Police JESSE B. CURRY, Dallas Police Department, Dallas, Texas, to turn over all of the evidence collected that he was examining, which related to LEE HARVEY OSWALD, to the FBI shortly before midnight on November 22, 1963.”

Those words were apparently written by Vincent Drain on 9/8/64. The words in “No More Silence” by Larry Sneed are Carl Day’s words.