Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?  (Read 43617 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #136 on: September 14, 2023, 01:56:41 PM »
Advertisement
too funny  :D

April 27, 1964:
"Our report presumably will state that the President was hit by the first bullet, Governor Connally by the second, and the President by the third and fatal bullet. The report will also conclude that the bullets were fired by one person located in the sixth floor southeast corner window of the TSBD building."


Presumably

adverb
by assuming reasonably; probably:


This was one person assuming something that he was unsure about (hence he used the word presumably). Got it?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #136 on: September 14, 2023, 01:56:41 PM »


Offline Michael Welch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #137 on: September 14, 2023, 02:02:23 PM »
I agree, and without a missed shot there probably would not have been a SBT

Hi Michael, There were plenty of missed shots. There was a first missed shot which hit near the Chism family and made sparks on either the street or left the six inch scar on the sidewalk there. Later when Mr. James Tague was standing up in the open about 40 feet from the Commerce Street triple underpass he was nicked by either a bullet fragment or a chip of the concrete curb there. At the same time a bullet hit the corner of the manhole cover and lodged itself in the grass. It was picked up and pocketed by a blond haired man in a suit who is unknown. So there were plenty of bullets to go around. Both John and Nellie went to their graves saying the first shot hit the President; the second shot hit John; and the third shot hit the President. People have done very strange things for sixty years out of fear. Buell Wesley Frazier has only just recently described a man similar to James Braden who threw a rifle in the back seat of his car in between the Dal-Tex and TSBD. Roy Edward Lewis is found on the Bronson, Nix, Hughes, and Zapruder films behind Jean Hill and Mary Moorman, yet he maintains/swears that he was behind the glass at the TSBD entrance and saw people hit the ground in front of him after he heard Boom, Boom, Boom. So he was and is still living in fear. The Warren Commission was super flexible with their interpretation of the evidence. The throat wound was initially okayed to be on Houston street right before the turn on ELM. Then it was allowed that the President looked back at the Sixth floor window and was shot. All they needed was creative lawyers like Arlen Specter and they could come up with any scenario. Thank you for your input! Sincerely yours, Michael

« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 02:11:08 PM by Michael Welch »

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #138 on: September 14, 2023, 02:18:35 PM »

Presumably

adverb
by assuming reasonably; probably:


This was one person assuming something that he was unsure about (hence he used the word presumably). Got it?

yea, at the end of April.

you, funny  :D

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #138 on: September 14, 2023, 02:18:35 PM »


Offline Michael Capasse

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #139 on: September 14, 2023, 02:21:15 PM »
Commission had no investigators on the ground and had to rely on the FBI
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 02:22:32 PM by Michael Capasse »

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5291
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #140 on: September 14, 2023, 02:33:03 PM »
Hi Michael, There were plenty of missed shots. There was a first missed shot which hit near the Chism family and made sparks on either the street or left the six inch scar on the sidewalk there. Later when Mr. James Tague was standing up in the open about 40 feet from the Commerce Street triple underpass he was nicked by either a bullet fragment or a chip of the concrete curb there. At the same time a bullet hit the corner of the manhole cover and lodged itself in the grass. It was picked up and pocketed by a blond haired man in a suit who is unknown. So there were plenty of bullets to go around. Both John and Nellie went to their graves saying the first shot hit the President; the second shot hit John; and the third shot hit the President. People have done very strange things for sixty years out of fear. Buell Wesley Frazier has only just recently described a man similar to James Braden who threw a rifle in the back seat of his car in between the Dal-Tex and TSBD. Roy Edward Lewis is found on the Bronson, Nix, Hughes, and Zapruder films behind Jean Hill and Mary Moorman, yet he maintains/swears that he was behind the glass at the TSBD entrance and saw people hit the ground in front of him after he heard Boom, Boom, Boom. So he was and is still living in fear. The Warren Commission was super flexible with their interpretation of the evidence. The throat wound was initially okayed to be on Houston street right before the turn on ELM. Then it was allowed that the President looked back at the Sixth floor window and was shot. All they needed was creative lawyers like Arlen Specter and they could come up with any scenario. Thank you for your input! Sincerely yours, Michael

It was like the gunfight at OK Corral!  I'm surprised any lived to tell the tale.  LOL.  Wasn't there an analysis of the witness testimony confirming that over 90% of witnesses indicated that they heard two or three shots?  Almost no one suggested more than three shots.  Even Landis was adamant that he heard three shots.  And although there was disagreeing on the location of the shots based upon the sound distortions in an open area, almost no one suggested that they heard shots from two different locations.  One shooter firing no more than three shots is the overwhelming take away from those present. 
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 02:33:38 PM by Richard Smith »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #140 on: September 14, 2023, 02:33:03 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #141 on: September 14, 2023, 02:46:07 PM »
yea, at the end of April.

you, funny  :D


The reenactment took place in May. The theory originated in February. Tague had nothing to do with the origins of the Theory. Your claim is false.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #142 on: September 14, 2023, 02:49:57 PM »
Commission had no investigators on the ground and had to rely on the FBI

Not at all. The WC interviewed a multitude of witnesses. The WC hired many independent experts to examine the evidence. The WC questioned a lot of what the FBI provided. The SBT is a result of that.

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #143 on: September 14, 2023, 02:59:43 PM »
Not at all. The WC interviewed a multitude of witnesses. The WC hired many independent experts to examine the evidence. The WC questioned a lot of what the FBI provided. The SBT is a result of that.

Because of a missed shot having gone public. So called "independent experts" were called in to support a lone gunman theory.

WC Executive Session | Jan 22, 1964
A: They would like to have us fold up and quit.

Boggs: This closes the case, you see. Don't you see?
Dulles: Yes, I see that.

Rankin: They found the man. There is nothing more to do. The Commission supports their conclusions, and WC can go on home and that is
the end of it.

***************************
Jan 27th: The writer of the April memo Norman Redlich led the meeting on the Z film & Nix film  - to determine when the 3 shots had hit.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 05:34:51 PM by Michael Capasse »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #143 on: September 14, 2023, 02:59:43 PM »