RIP to the Single-bullet theory?

[Royell Storing]

Your “conclusions” are not supported by anything at all. Regardless of what was opined in an executive session of the commission, here are some facts:


“History Will Prove Us Right, by Howard Willens, pp.79-80:

Redlich and I shared the view that our reliance on an FBI we didn’t fully trust meant we would have to work harder and longer to be sure we checked out every fact. We felt the weight of the staff lawyers’ distrust of the FBI as they accelerated the pace of investigative requests to check and double-check facts. Rankin had instructed that all such investigative requests should go to me before they went to him for approval. Rankin also felt the burden as he approved the taking of sworn testimony from an ever-growing list of individuals with potentially relevant information.
  This process ultimately produced testimony from 552 people: 94 witnesses who appeared before the commission, 395 witnesses deposed by commission lawyers, 61 witnesses who provided sworn affidavits, and 2 who provided statements. In assessing this entire record of testimony, and more than three thousand exhibits, the commission had the responsibility to do what federal investigative agencies do not customarily do—evaluate all the available evidence and make reasoned judgments of the conclusions that are supported by that evidence. This process is one that lawyers routinely are called upon by their clients—whether public or private—to undertake, and the commission members and lawyers had a wealth of experience in doing exactly that.

   Does your, "EVALUATE all the available evidence...", include moving a back wound UP to the neck? It's difficult to rely on WC "evidence" when it has been manipulated.

[Charles Collins]

   Does your, "EVALUATE all the available evidence...", include moving a back wound UP to the neck? It's difficult to rely on WC "evidence" when it has been manipulated.

Even the HSCA, which tried very hard (too hard actually) to find a conspiracy, confirmed the SBT.

[Michael Capasse]

Your “conclusions” are not supported by anything at all. Regardless of what was opined in an executive session of the commission, here are some facts:

"...that our reliance on an FBI..."

Do you read what you post?

 

[John Iacoletti]

Charles prefers an account published by a single person 50 years later to contemporaneous executive session transcripts, because of course he does.

Why is it that the LN-faithful never accuse people like Willens of making up stuff to sell books on anniversaries?

[Charles Collins]

Do you read what you post?

Taking a few words out of the context and implying that they mean something sinister (AKA distortion by omission) is the MO of the CT. 

[Charles Collins]

Charles prefers an account published by a single person 50 years later to contemporaneous executive session transcripts, because of course he does.

Why is it that the LN-faithful never accuse people like Willens of making up stuff to sell books on anniversaries?

I stated earlier that Willens’ book is based upon his journal which was kept contemporaneously with the progress of the WC. It is freely available online through the Sixth Floor Museum. And there is also a series of interviews with Willens done by the SFM that are also freely available online. That’’s one of the reasons why…

[Michael Capasse]

Taking a few words out of the context and implying that they mean something sinister (AKA distortion by omission) is the MO of the CT. 

what are you babbling now?

The WC had to rely on the FBI for it's "investigation"- even when they needed an 'independent expert" they called on the FBI to get it.
Is there something WC did that Hoover was not aware of, or more importantly, didn't approve of?

...please name it.

[Charles Collins]

what are you babbling now?

The WC had to rely on the FBI for it's "investigation"- even when they needed an 'independent expert" they called on the FBI to get it.
Is there something WC did that Hoover was not aware of, or more importantly, didn't approve of?

...please name it.

The SBT comes to mind…