Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?  (Read 43616 times)

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3163
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #208 on: September 17, 2023, 02:03:11 AM »
Advertisement
If you didn’t follow the proper procedures for discovering evidence and creating a chain of custody, would you mention the evidence in your report?

First question: “Where’s the bullet?”

How would his superiors have responded if he said he left it on a stretcher or operating table?


What we do know is that a different SS agent at Parkland put a bullet found near a stretcher in his pocket and brought it to DC. Which also doesn’t seem like a good way to handle evidence.

The question has always been, did the bullet come from Governor Connolly’s stretcher or Kennedy’s?

Even if we exclude Landis’ story, there’s other witnesses who saw a bullet on Kennedy’s stretcher at Parkland.

A bullet fell from Connally's stretcher as he was being moved onto the operating table and was picked up by a nurse who showed it to Henry Wade who told her to give it to a police officer. She gave it to Bob Nolan who put it on Fritz's desk. By the time it reached the FBI lab it had miraculously changed into four small fragments taken from Connally's wrist.

Tomlinson found a "hunting slug" with a pointed tip which he gave to O. P. Wright who gave it to SA Johnsen. He gave it to his chief, Rowley, and by the time it reached the FBI lab it had miraculously changed into CE399.

Any bullet found on JFK's stretcher just disappeared.

And so it goes.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #208 on: September 17, 2023, 02:03:11 AM »


Online David Von Pein

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #209 on: September 17, 2023, 02:19:26 AM »
And thank you for implicity confirming that we can not rely on what any law enforcement officer failed to mention in their day one report....  Thumb1:

It depends on what the evidence is and how important it is.

One of the things you mentioned on your four-item list in your last post is definitely wrong.....because Lieutenant Day did report that he "had been successful in raising a partial latent print" off of the Carcano rifle. And Lt. Day said that on 11/22/63, as confirmed here.

The next-most-important item on your previous list would be the Odum/Tomlinson/FD-302 matter, which I discussed years ago here.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2023, 02:20:47 AM by David Von Pein »

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #210 on: September 17, 2023, 02:20:47 AM »
It depends on what the evidence is and how important it is.

One of the things you mentioned on your four-item list in your last post is definitely wrong.....because Lieutenant Day did report that he "had been successful in raising a partial latent print" off of the Carcano rifle. And Lt. Day said that on 11/22/63, as confirmed here.

The next-most-important item on your previous list would be the Odum/Tomlinson/FD-302 matter, which I discussed years ago here.

Your desperation is obvious.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #210 on: September 17, 2023, 02:20:47 AM »


Online David Von Pein

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #211 on: September 17, 2023, 02:23:20 AM »
Your desperation is obvious.

Your lack of ability to put things in proper context is duly noted.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #212 on: September 17, 2023, 02:52:09 AM »
One of the things you mentioned on your four-item list in your last post is definitely wrong.....because Lieutenant Day did report that he "had been successful in raising a partial latent print" off of the Carcano rifle. And Lt. Day said that on 11/22/63, as confirmed here.

Uh, Dave, this memo is talking about a print he didn’t lift.

Quote
The next-most-important item on your previous list would be the Odum/Tomlinson/FD-302 matter, which I discussed years ago here.

And by “discussed”, you just mean trotting out the same old lame excuse, “Odum must have forgotten”.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #212 on: September 17, 2023, 02:52:09 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #213 on: September 17, 2023, 02:53:02 AM »
Your lack of ability to put things in proper context is duly noted.

“Proper context” defined as agreeing with Dave’s assumptions.

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #214 on: September 17, 2023, 02:54:06 AM »
Your lack of ability to put things in proper context is duly noted.

Do you even know what the words "proper context" mean.

Out of four things I have mentioned you only reply to two and neither have any merit. As John pointed out, Day said that he had not lifted a print (which he claimed was there, but the FBI could not find it) and the Odum "excuse" is just silly.

All you have shown here is your cherry picking of the evidence you like and what you don't like is what Landis has said. It is pathetic....



« Last Edit: September 17, 2023, 03:00:55 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Online David Von Pein

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #215 on: September 17, 2023, 03:01:59 AM »
...what you don't like is what Landis has said.

Mr. Landis has discredited himself, via his archived newspaper interviews from 1983 and 1988 (plus his comments that appear in the 2010 book "The Kennedy Detail"), as discussed in detail here:

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2023/06/paul-landis.html
« Last Edit: September 17, 2023, 03:30:41 AM by David Von Pein »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #215 on: September 17, 2023, 03:01:59 AM »