RIP to the Single-bullet theory?

[Charles Collins]

End of April '64 the Report would still say 3 shots - 3 hits - James Teague caused that to change.

Sorry, but no he didn’t.

[Michael Capasse]

Sorry, but no he didn’t.

He most certainly did and could not be ignored.
There was no SBT before the end April '64 and it seems not for a period of time after that.

Then Tague talked Jim Lehrer June 3rd '64 - it was huge.

[Michael Capasse]

I think the Nutters should have a meeting over this Landis story.
And go with it. It explains the missed shot; it explains the back wound.

what's the problem?

[Charles Collins]

He most certainly did and could not be ignored.
There was no SBT before the end April '64 and it seems not for a period of time after that.

Then Teague talked Jim Lehrer June 3rd '64 - it was huge.

Did you read the snip I posted that indicates that the WC was already considering the SBT in February? And it includes some of their reason(s).

[Michael Capasse]

Did you read the snip I posted that indicates that the WC was already considering the SBT in February? And it includes some of their reason(s).

Feb. ? that's funny.
https://jfk.boards.net/post/3595

MEMORANDUM | April 27, 1964

TO: J. Lee Rankin
FROM: Norman Redlich

Our report presumably will state that the President was hit by the first bullet,
Governor Connally by the second, and the President by the third and fatal bullet.

[John Iacoletti]

"The only person I recall seeing clearly was a Negro male in light green slacks and a beige colored shirt running from my left to right, up the slope, across a grassy section, along a sidewalk, towards some steps and what appeared to be a low stone wall.

Arthur Chism?

[John Iacoletti]

From “History Will Prove Us Right” by Howard Willens, pp. 120-122:
. . .

However, remnants of only two bullets were found in the presidential vehicle.

 

[John Iacoletti]

FFS, it’s Tague, not Teague.