Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?  (Read 43678 times)

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #128 on: September 14, 2023, 12:43:35 PM »
Advertisement
The only reason for a SBT was a missed shot.
The James Tague hit was public and became the missed shot.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 12:46:07 PM by Michael Capasse »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #128 on: September 14, 2023, 12:43:35 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #129 on: September 14, 2023, 12:51:40 PM »
The FBI, in their investigation during the immediate aftermath of the Kennedy assassination, didn’t consider the idea that Kennedy and Connolly were struck by the same bullet. They also didn’t consider the idea that at least one shot missed.

James Tague’s injury is what led to the birth of the Single-Bullet theory.

http://22november1963.org.uk/single-bullet-theory-jfk-assassination



The only reason for a SBT was a missed shot.
The James Tague hit was public and became the missed shot.



I have already posted Willens’ account which in no uncertain terms explains how the SBT originated. It was not due to Tague. It was to explain where the bullet went after it exited JFK’s throat. [Edit: this theory began in February 1964]
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 12:52:50 PM by Charles Collins »

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #130 on: September 14, 2023, 12:57:43 PM »



I have already posted Willens’ account which in no uncertain terms explains how the SBT originated. It was not due to Tague. It was to explain where the bullet went after it exited JFK’s throat. [Edit: this theory began in February 1964]

Based on an internal memo at the end of April, your timing is wrong.  ;)
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 01:01:06 PM by Michael Capasse »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #130 on: September 14, 2023, 12:57:43 PM »


Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #131 on: September 14, 2023, 01:04:49 PM »



I have already posted Willens’ account which in no uncertain terms explains how the SBT originated. It was not due to Tague. It was to explain where the bullet went after it exited JFK’s throat. [Edit: this theory began in February 1964]

It's possible, even likely, that the FBI knew they had a problem prior to April 1964 but the public becoming aware of Tague's injury is what forced them to come up with an explanation for the throat wound.

The public hadn't seen the autopsy photos or Zapruder film at that point so there would've been little doubt about the FBI's findings had the James Tague issue not become part of the public's awareness...

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #132 on: September 14, 2023, 01:15:28 PM »
It's possible, even likely, that the FBI knew they had a problem prior to April 1964 but the public becoming aware of Tague's injury is what forced them to come up with an explanation for the throat wound.

The public hadn't seen the autopsy photos or Zapruder film at that point so there would've been little doubt about the FBI's findings had the James Tague issue not become part of the public's awareness...

I agree, and without a missed shot there probably would not have been a SBT

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #132 on: September 14, 2023, 01:15:28 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #133 on: September 14, 2023, 01:47:00 PM »
Based on an internal memo at the end of April, your timing is wrong.  ;)

No it’s not. You are jumping to the wrong conclusion regarding the memo. Your claim that Tague caused the SBT is wrong by several months and the wrong reason. Live with it…

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #134 on: September 14, 2023, 01:50:25 PM »
No it’s not. You are jumping to the wrong conclusion regarding the memo. Your claim that Tague caused the SBT is wrong by several months and the wrong reason. Live with it

too funny  :D

April 27, 1964:
"Our report presumably will state that the President was hit by the first bullet, Governor Connally by the second, and the President by the third and fatal bullet. The report will also conclude that the bullets were fired by one person located in the sixth floor southeast corner window of the TSBD building."
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 01:52:03 PM by Michael Capasse »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #135 on: September 14, 2023, 01:53:13 PM »
It's possible, even likely, that the FBI knew they had a problem prior to April 1964 but the public becoming aware of Tague's injury is what forced them to come up with an explanation for the throat wound.

The public hadn't seen the autopsy photos or Zapruder film at that point so there would've been little doubt about the FBI's findings had the James Tague issue not become part of the public's awareness...



I agree, and without a missed shot there probably would not have been a SBT


The WC investigators were questioning the FBI and SS conclusions as early as February. The SBT originated as a result. This also blows to hell the silly idea that the WC blindly accepted everything the FBI came up with. Tague was not the cause of the SBT.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #135 on: September 14, 2023, 01:53:13 PM »