Josiah Thompson - Who Was the Umbrella Man?

[Royell Storing]

 The NIX Film has serious issues: (1) Original Film missing for decades, (2) Version distributed showing Elm St running UPHILL, (3) White Shirt Man shown running Up-The-Steps.

[John Mytton]

Hi Dan, Listen to him yourself starting around the 19 minute mark! Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael

Sorry Michael, my dear wonderful friend but Mantik is talking out his Asshole!

This frame comes from your video and is pointing Mantik's "soft matte" which appears to Mantik when viewed in 3D with it's pair is actually "2D".



Now, here's the two stereoscopic autopsy images side by side that Mantik was referring to and which I have posted many times in the past and when viewed stereoscopically they produce a PERFECT 3D image. And if you don't believe me look at them yourself through a 3D viewer! Go ahead I'll wait.





But after members couldn't actually figure out how to view these images stereoscopically because let's face it most have the same low intellectual capacity as Royell, who btw still hasn't the technical knowledge to post a photo and couldn't photo analyse his way out of a wet paper bag. So I found a way to combine 2x stereoscopic images into a rotating morph and any "added soft 2D mattes" would simply be easily discovered and would not show the same smooth rotation but as can be clearly seen Mantik was simply making up stuff.



And further to what Mantik was claiming, he said the 2D anomaly was unique to the above stereoscopic photos and the others showed a 3D effect, which unfortunately for Mantik is seen in the following Autopsy photo and shows the same wound as described in the Autopsy report and as seen in Zapruder. Mantik obviously didn't know that we would all eventually have the ability to see EXACTLY what he saw and he simply hoped that his lies would remain secret, what a sad deluded man!



Btw before you go off on another tangent and make another silly claim as usual, first deal with the above evidence. Thanks in advance!

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

  How about addressing the Parkland Hospital Dr's observations of JFK's body only 10-15 minutes following the Kill Shot? This would be before the Body of JFK was stolen.

[John Mytton]

    Have you ever taken a look at the NIX FILM which shows Elm St running UPHILL??

Wtf are you talking about? Elm street has a slope of iirc about 3.15 degrees.
As I have already stated you have the visual analysis ability of a gnat!
Your piss poor skills are referring to the fact that Nix wasn't holding his camera horizontally. But look at the vertical lamppost which has also been rotated and when straightened, voila, we have the expected slope of Elm. Royell you really shouldn't be doing this and as I told Michael, you should focus your attention elsewhere like perhaps going out and playing in the traffic.





JohnM

[Michael Welch]

Sorry Michael, my dear wonderful friend but Mantik is talking out his Asshole!

This frame comes from your video and is pointing Mantik's "soft matte" which appears to Mantik when viewed in 3D with it's pair is actually "2D".



Now, here's the two stereoscopic autopsy images side by side that Mantik was referring to and which I have posted many times in the past and when viewed stereoscopically they produce a PERFECT 3D image. And if you don't believe me look at them yourself through a 3D viewer! Go ahead I'll wait.





But after members couldn't actually figure out how to view these images stereoscopically because let's face it most have the same low intellectual capacity as Royell, who btw still hasn't the technical knowledge to post a photo and couldn't photo analyse his way out of a wet paper bag. So I found a way to combine 2x stereoscopic images into a rotating morph and any "added soft 2D mattes" would simply be easily discovered and would not show the same smooth rotation but as can be clearly seen Mantik was simply making up stuff.



And further to what Mantik was claiming, he said the 2D anomaly was unique to the above stereoscopic photos and the others showed a 3D effect, which unfortunately for Mantik is seen in the following Autopsy photo and shows the same wound as described in the Autopsy report and as seen in Zapruder. Mantik obviously didn't know that we would all eventually have the ability to see EXACTLY what he saw and he simply hoped that his lies would remain secret, what a sad deluded man!



Btw before you go off on another tangent and make another silly claim as usual, first deal with the above evidence. Thanks in advance!

JohnM

Hi John, Listen to the men starting about the 33 minute mark and concentrate on the picture of the back of the president's head at 33:50. You can see the fake wet area very clearly! Thank you for your input! Sincerely yours, Michael

[John Mytton]

  How about addressing the Parkland Hospital Dr's observations of JFK's body only 10-15 minutes following the Kill Shot? This would be before the Body of JFK was stolen.

I'll go you one better, how about refuting Clint Hill who saw the wound almost immediately after it happened? Hmmm?



And now explain the first eyewitnesses in Dealey plaza who saw Kennedy before and actually saw him being shot? Hmmmmm?



JohnM

[Dan O'meara]

  How about addressing the Parkland Hospital Dr's observations of JFK's body only 10-15 minutes following the Kill Shot? This would be before the Body of JFK was stolen.

This has already been done Royell.
You have the memory of a goldfish.

[John Mytton]

Hi John, Listen to the men starting about the 33 minute mark and concentrate on the picture of the back of the president's head at 33:50. You can see the fake wet area very clearly! Thank you for your input! Sincerely yours, Michael

Firstly, even though I asked nicely, I knew you wouldn't/couldn't deal with my evidence which is a common problem with you.

Secondly this is hilarious, these are YOUR back of head eyewitnesses and they are all over the place, maybe they all should have got together first and consolidated their lies?



Whereas the REAL eyewitnesses are totally consistent.



Who to believe? Some inconsistent back of head eyewitnesses or consistent eyewitnesses, the Zapruder film, the Autopsy photos, the autopsy Xrays, the Autopsy report of a fully cleaned up and thoroughly examined body? The choice is easy for an intellectual!

JohnM