Josiah Thompson - Who Was the Umbrella Man?

[Michael Welch]

Firstly, even though I asked nicely, I knew you wouldn't/couldn't deal with my evidence which is a common problem with you.

Secondly this is hilarious, these are YOUR back of head eyewitnesses and they are all over the place, maybe they all should have got together first and consolidated their lies?



Whereas the REAL eyewitnesses are totally consistent.



Who to believe? Some inconsistent back of head eyewitnesses or consistent eyewitnesses, the Zapruder film, the Autopsy photos, the autopsy Xrays, the Autopsy report of a fully cleaned up and thoroughly examined body? The choice is easy for an intellectual!

JohnM

Hi John, Draw yourself a picture plotting your consistent witnesses's locations and post it! Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael

[Royell Storing]

Wtf are you talking about? Elm street has a slope of iirc about 3.15 degrees.
As I have already stated you have the visual analysis ability of a gnat!
Your piss poor skills are referring to the fact that Nix wasn't holding his camera horizontally. But look at the vertical lamppost which has also been rotated and when straightened, voila, we have the expected slope of Elm. Royell you really shouldn't be doing this and as I told Michael, you should focus your attention elsewhere like perhaps going out and playing in the traffic.





JohnM

       John - Cat got your tongue?  (1) You continue running away from the White Shirt Man running Up-The Steps, (2) Nix Original Film = MIA.  This is what happens when bad news is delivered. (3) Shoot the messenger/Nix. 

[John Mytton]

Hi John, Draw yourself a picture plotting your consistent witnesses's locations and post it! Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael

You gotta be joking?, They're all pointing to the open wound or the first eyewitnesses are pointing to where the obvious bone flap was exposed, as I said Total consistency!

Now your best eyewitness is McClelland, who indicates a blown out hole but your eyewitnesses saw something TOTALLY different, please explain? I know you won't because you will run away, like you always do, but do remember that our audience can completely see your constant evasions and weak diversions.





JohnM

[Michael Welch]

You gotta be joking?, They're all pointing to the open wound or the first eyewitnesses are pointing to where the obvious bone flap was exposed, as I said Total consistency!

Now your best eyewitness is McClelland, who indicates a blown out hole but your eyewitnesses saw something TOTALLY different, please explain? I know you won't because you will run away, like you always do, but do remember that our audience can completely see your constant evasions and weak diversions.





JohnM

Hi John, No not my witnesses! Draw the locations of your witnesses! You have Zapruder in the front, Gayle here Bill there etc.... Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael

[John Mytton]

       John - Cat got your tongue?  (1) You continue running away from the White Shirt Man running Up-The Steps, (2) Nix Original Film = MIA.  This is what happens when bad news is delivered. (3) Shoot the messenger/Nix.

Again with the diversions, what is it about reality that you guys can't comprehend?

Anyway your analysis of Nix is total Bollocks!

(1) You continue running away from the White Shirt Man running Up-The Steps,

Please explain in your less goofiest way possible, why on Earth your conspirators would need to go to the trouble of having a "White Shirt Man running Up-The Steps"? And then explain in your own words how your conspirators would add this man to a tiny 8mm film frame?

(2) Nix Original Film = MIA.  This is what happens when bad news is delivered. (3) Shoot the messenger/Nix.

Nix, Muchmore and Zapruder ALL show the same event from three different angles and you apparently believe that ALL three were altered to match with mathematical precision. Again show the Forum how this was possible with the technology available at the time?

And when comparing Muchmore to Nix, we see in Muchmore the man in the white shirt turn and start to move up the stairs and then in Nix we see the same man disappear into the shadows further up the stairs. I'm so sorry to continually humiliate you, but you're asking for it!

In Muchmore the man first turns and starts up the stairs.
In Nix we see the man further up the stairs and disappear into the shadows.



JohnM

[John Mytton]

Hi John, No not my witnesses! Draw the locations of your witnesses! You have Zapruder in the front, Gayle here Bill there etc.... Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael

This is getting tedious, your inability to deal with evidence that fractures your distorted World view is duly noted!

Whereas I deal with everything and let the chips fall wherever they may!

Anyway, are your comprehension skills as poor as your analytical skills, I said the first eyewitnesses who Gayle and Bill were part of and had a limited viewpoint, were pointing to the obvious bone flap and the direction of the explosion whereas the other eyewitnesses had a better look at the top of the head, it's not that complicated.



Btw again I'll ask you, how did McClelland your star eyewitness while standing over Kennedy look down into a hole in the back of Kennedy's head and don't forget Kennedy wasn't turned over at the time? And Michael my very good friend, please don't run away this time



JohnM

[Dan O'meara]

Hi John, No not my witnesses! Draw the locations of your witnesses! You have Zapruder in the front, Gayle here Bill there etc.... Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael

John has destroyed your big evidence for Z-film alteration - Mantik's inability to understand stereoscopic pictures.
This was your main evidence for Z-film alteration
You never say how this alteration was done, you never explain how all footage of the assassination could be similarly altered, you never explain why the Z-film, the autopsy pictures and the testimonies of Jenkins, O' Connor, Riebe, Humes, Boswell and Stringer all point to a massive head wound encompassing nearly the entire upper right hand side of JFK's skull.

On the flip side, anything you have presented to support alteration has been dismissed with ease.
You do not have a scrap of credible evidence supporting alteration.
And you have lost all credibility in front of the forum with your evasiveness and silly arguments.
Remember - the forum is a written record.

Take your silly fantasies about alteration and run along.

[Michael Welch]

At JFK’s autopsy, there were two FBI agents on hand. They were Frank O’Neill and James Sibert. They reported what they heard at the autopsy. They were interviewed by Specter in early 1964 and he wrote very unfavorable comments about O’Neill and Sibert in a summary report to the Warren Commission. There was a reason for this. Specter knew that O’Neill and Sibert were providing evidence that the single-bullet theory could not be true.

Neither O’Neill nor Sibert testified to the Warren Commission and their written notes were classified. But in 1997, both O’Neill and Sibert gave depositions to the ARRB. They were shown the autopsy photographs of JFK’s head. They both said that they did not see anything like that at the autopsy.

Sibert drew a head wound diagram for the ARRB and said this about the wound in the back of JFK’s head, “There was a piece about the size of a 3×5 card that was missing.”
Missing occiptal bone.




Hi John and Dan, Notice no blood where your fake photos and film show a shot--- the right front. Where is gravity? The Parkland doctors like Dr. Jenkins said that blood just gushed out of the head wound and filled his shoe! Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael