How Many Shots?

[Duncan MacRae]

[John Mytton]

JohnM

[Michael Welch]

Hi Duncan, The beauty of people hearing three shots is there were two groups of three shots, in my opinion of course. Therefore, if people heard three shots and it was wanted to be the number of shots to match the Oswald's shell casings, it became easily enforced into the witnesses' memory by the FBI, etc. Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael

[Royell Storing]

Hi Duncan, The beauty of people hearing three shots is there were two groups of three shots, in my opinion of course. Therefore, if people heard three shots and it was wanted to be the number of shots to match the Oswald's shell casings, it became easily enforced into the witnesses' memory by the FBI, etc. Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael

     Once again, this is intended Mis-Direction. STOP FOCUSING on how many shots were fired. The issue here is that there was NOT ENOUGH TIME to work a  bolt action rifle and fire off BOTH the 2nd and 3rd SHOTS. You guys are repeatedly slipping on the same banana peel. FOCUS on the bolt action timing issue regarding the 2nd and 3rd shots. 

[Jack Nessan]

JohnM

Visuals such as this are very misleading. Given the various types of witnesses and the fact they were changing their statements with time to fit the influence of the medias reporting, graphs and pie charts like this provide zero information. Nowhere in this chart is the fact that most eyewitnesses are two shot witnesses and there is a number of three shot witnesses who describe the second shot as the headshot. Recently posted Sitzman, Brehm, Newmans, Hargis and Altgens are all two shot witnesses. Gayle Newman in the posted video is an excellent example of the media’s influence.

 

[Jack Nessan]

     Once again, this is intended Mis-Direction. STOP FOCUSING on how many shots were fired. The issue here is that there was NOT ENOUGH TIME to work a  bolt action rifle and fire off BOTH the 2nd and 3rd SHOTS. You guys are repeatedly slipping on the same banana peel. FOCUS on the bolt action timing issue regarding the 2nd and 3rd shots.

The number of shots holds no meaning but then a post about how there was insufficient time? The fact there was only two shots requires no time explanation.

[Royell Storing]

Visuals such as this are very misleading. Given the various types of witnesses and the fact they were changing their statements with time to fit the influence of the medias reporting, graphs and pie charts like this provide zero information. Nowhere in this chart is the fact that most eyewitnesses are two shot witnesses and there is a number of three shot witnesses who describe the second shot as the headshot. Recently posted Sitzman, Brehm, Newmans, Hargis and Altgens are all two shot witnesses. Gayle Newman in the posted video is an excellent example of the media’s influence.

    This comes down to a TIMING ISSUE. They now realize that the ELAPSED TIME of the shots just does NOT WORK with a bolt action rifle allegedly being used. So this means you get Yahoo's like Max Holland sent into duty and expanding the elapsed firing time to around 12 Seconds along with moving the JFK Limo position. As their false narrative is destroyed, they are then forced to move the goal posts. Same thing is gonna happen when the 7 Parkland Dr's drop their Bombshell on the Nov 14. These are Professionals with plenty to say. They are no longer scared as they accept the time to tell their FULL stories is running out.

[Jack Nessan]

    This comes down to a TIMING ISSUE. They now realize that the ELAPSED TIME of the shots just does NOT WORK with a bolt action rifle allegedly being used. So this means you get Yahoo's like Max Holland sent into duty and expanding the elapsed firing time to around 12 Seconds along with moving the JFK Limo position. As their false narrative is destroyed, they are then forced to move the goal posts. Same thing is gonna happen when the 7 Parkland Dr's drop their Bombshell on the Nov 14. These are Professionals with plenty to say. They are no longer scared as they accept the time to tell their FULL stories is running out.

No, your first claim was the number of shots did not matter. This claim is actually unbelievable that it was made by you.

Now your claim is about spacing which, depending on which witness, is all over the board.

How about you start by proving there were three shots.