From Behind the Fence

[Jack Nessan]

    Yes, I have seen the numerous re-creations. That is ALL they are. RE-CREATIONS. That is NOT SCIENCE. That is Rich Little doing Jimmy Stewart. It is an attempted "Knock-Off". Rich Little is NOT SCIENCE. A lot of you guys wanna "follow the science" until you don't. You're now being "Hoisted on your own petard". SCIENCE has determined that the SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE!  Some of us are going to ensure that this declaration of Multiple Shooters = Conspiracy does not get buried by "Re-Creations" or other sophomoric "Dress Rehearsals". You will Not dodge THE SCIENCE.

Interesting, you feel that if it was you sitting in front of JFK that you would not have been struck by the bullet that exited JFK's throat?  All because of some odd belief that some psuedo science is on your side and despite the fact that the HSCA expert assured you that being struck by the bullet would be the only possible outcome.

[Royell Storing]

Interesting, you feel that if it was you sitting in front of JFK that you would not have been struck by the bullet that exited JFK's throat?  All because of some odd belief that some psuedo science is on your side and despite the fact that the HSCA expert assured you that being struck by the bullet would be the only possible outcome.

 OK, now the attempt is made to label Knott Lab Laser 360 "pseudo science". So, what are you saying about our Justice System which currently routinely uses this SCIENCE to track bullet trajectories? And YOU wanna fall back on the HSCA? You do realize that was pushing 50 YEARS AGO? You like others around here are on TILT. Take a couple of Excedrin, lay down, and then get back to me. You're raving.

[Jack Nessan]

OK, now the attempt is made to label Knott Lab Laser 360 "pseudo science". So, what are you saying about our Justice System which currently routinely uses this SCIENCE to track bullet trajectories? And YOU wanna fall back on the HSCA? You do realize that was pushing 50 YEARS AGO? You like others around here are on TILT. Take a couple of Excedrin, lay down, and then get back to me. You're raving.

This is not a 20 foot or less shooting scene with known parameters. It appears their model cannot handle the distance and unknowns. All they do is provide a graphic representation. The same can be accomplished with a paper and pencil.

[Royell Storing]

This is not a 20 foot or less shooting scene with known parameters. It appears their model cannot handle the distance and unknowns. All they do is provide a graphic representation. The same can be accomplished with a paper and pencil.

   "Paper and pencil"?  And when are You planning NASA's next Moon trip?

[Jack Nessan]

   "Paper and pencil"?  And when are You planning NASA's next Moon trip?

The reality of it is it just a computer representation of what can also be accomplished with a paper and pencil. You don't understand that?

[John Mytton]

    Yes, I have seen the numerous re-creations. That is ALL they are. RE-CREATIONS. That is NOT SCIENCE. That is Rich Little doing Jimmy Stewart. It is an attempted "Knock-Off". Rich Little is NOT SCIENCE. A lot of you guys wanna "follow the science" until you don't. You're now being "Hoisted on your own petard". SCIENCE has determined that the SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE!  Some of us are going to ensure that this declaration of Multiple Shooters = Conspiracy does not get buried by "Re-Creations" or other sophomoric "Dress Rehearsals". You will Not dodge THE SCIENCE.

Sorry to interrupt this verbal diarrhoea Royell, the Warren Commission never relied on the SBF. Oops

There is very persuasive evidence from the experts to indicate that the same bullet which pierced the President’s throat also caused Governor Connally’s wounds. However, Governor Connally’s testimony and certain other factors have given rise to some difference of opinion as to this probability, but there is no question in the mind of any member of the Commission that all the shots which caused the President’s and Governor Connally’s wounds were fired from the sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

The reality of it is it just a computer representation of what can also be accomplished with a paper and pencil. You don't understand that?

     Your believing that the findings of SCIENCE can be replicated with a coloring book and a crayola explains why you accept the SBT along with falling back on the 50 yr old HSCA. Don't forget to shoe your horse and grease the wheels on that buggy of yours.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

This is not a 20 foot or less shooting scene with known parameters. It appears their model cannot handle the distance and unknowns. All they do is provide a graphic representation. The same can be accomplished with a paper and pencil.

The way to prove the SBT is to park the jfklimo at Z218, with a Connally sitting (with a bullseye on his back) & a jfk sitting (with bullseye on his back/neck), & look throo telescopic sights from up at the SN.
Then, by trial & error, arrange jfk & Connally & scope such that when jfk is removed the crosshairs on the scope are pointing at the bullseye on Connally.
If the position of Connally & jfk are nearnuff as per the Z frames before going behind the sign (&/or after emerging), then we have proved the SBT.

I think that there have been a number of tests over the years kind of similar to the above, & on each occasion the testers were happy with the SBT.
But i daresay that thems tests have had many shortcomings (eg using Queen Mary).
Proper tests were needed.