Hi Dan,
Absolutely correct, Dan!
I am amazed that anyone could actually believe that John Connally has been shot anywhere before he emerges from behind the sign. From the time Connally jerked his head from right to left to right , he remained in the same position until he re-emerges from behind the sign and shows the first sign of any change whatsoever to his face at frame 222 of the Zapruder film. Had Connally been struck at any point prior to frame 222-we would have seen. Not a shred of evidence to support such a theory that Connally was struck before he went behind the sign.
Hi Steve,
There's no point in getting into how insane Andrew's theory is.
Getting back to the Knotts Lab reconstruction, below is a composite I've done from the Knotts reconstruction of z225:
The red line represents the trajectory of the bullet through Connally.
One of the very few things that is universally agreed is that Connally was shot in the back, near the armpit, and the bullet exited his chest.
Has it not occurred to anyone at Knott Labs that, in their model, it is impossible for Connally to have been shot in the back without the bullet passing through JFK? Surely they have studied the Z-film, it forms the basis of their reconstruction.
The evidence in the Z-film that JBC is shot through by z225 is overwhelming:
z222 JBC emerges from behind the Stemmons sign looking composed
z222-223 JBC's white shirt cuff disappears behind the limo door as his wrist is struck
z223-224 The right side of JBC's jacket bulges as debris exits his chest
z224-225 JBC begins thrashing around
z225-onwards JBC's radical reaction continues.
The Knott lab reconstruction is nonsense but it seems they don't have to answer any questions about it.