Kris Kringle

[Charles Collins]

The movie “Miracle on 34th Street” is about a skeptic who became a believer. And the story tells us what it took for that to happen. I was once a skeptic regarding the “official” JFK assassination findings. One of the “aha moments” that convinced me to start all over and take a fresh look at things was when I realized that the SBT was the only explanation that fit the evidence. And even though I keep an open mind to learning new things, whenever anyone sheds any kind of doubt on an aspect, the resulting research tends to confirm to me that the WC got most everything right.

So, I ask for your criteria for what made you a believer. Or, if you are a skeptic, what would it take to convince you that the case was essentially solved before LHO was murdered?

60-years is a long time to be doomed to doubt. If you ever decide that you want answers instead of endless questions, what would it take to convince you?

[Charles Collins]

Today's Top-Trending Google Search: "Kris Kringle Dallas 1963 JFK".

LOL

[John Iacoletti]

Even if you do believe the single bullet fantasy, that doesn’t tell you a thing about who fired any of the shots.

As for “what would it take to convince me that the case was essentially solved before LHO was murdered”, it would take reliable conclusive evidence that the “solution” is actually true. It certainly didn’t exist before LHO was murdered, and it doesn’t exist 60 years later.

[Michael Walton]

To add to the above.

The SBT was created by the lawyers after LHO was murdered. To basically fit a square peg into a round hole. Anyone with a pair of eyes and a reasonable amount sanity can see that the Z film shows that the timing of the shots nullifies the SBT. Someone who took a shot (Connolly) said as much, that he was hit after he heard the first shot, which was why he started to look back to see what the commotion was about.

Before the lawyers got a hold of it, they had no idea how the wounds could have happened. There's a photo during the recreation at Dealey showing markings on the stand-ins. There's a mark on the back of the neck where no neck wound existed per the autopsy report. This marking was put there to show that they were trying to figure out how a bullet entered the right rear of the back and "exited" the neck. It couldn't be done physically, so the lawyers got a hold of it and made the SBT.

It's really that simple, but we'll never get the honest answer from officialdom and still haven't 60 years on.

https://www.patspeer.com/chapter12bbullspombleprofglidnoctobunsandbeyond

[Michael Walton]

Sure, Jerry, sure. Keep on deluding yourself. Yeah sure - that wound is the "base of the neck." What a xxxxxxx joke. And explain to me how the xxxx the back wound would have an exit where your 3D ruler is, way up on the neck. And don't forget, Jerry, there was NO throughput on that back wound. That's right, Jerry.

It's impossible, Jerry. And you haven't even said a word about the reenactment photo I mentioned. Why did they even stick a marker on the back of the neck as seen in the photo when there is no wound there? Because they were scratching their heads and saying, "Hmmm...that back wound couldn't possibly exit where that neck marker is.  Hmmm."

But yeah, Jerry, sure. Keep on deluding yourself. You're probably another one of those Kennedy haters who, even if Kennedy arose from his grave and said, "Yeah, I took two shots from different locations" you STILL wouldn't believe it.

[Michael Walton]

"The "back" wound entered "the base of the right side of the neck", per the autopsy report.

    "The other missile entered the right superior posterior thorax above the
     scapula and traversed the soft tissues of the supra-scapular and the
     supra-clavicular portions of the base of the right side of the neck."

HAHAHAHA!!! Sure, Jerry, sure. that's really the base of the neck, alright.  Even Wiki describes what's really the "neck," Jerry:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neck

The neck is, you know, the thing that supports the head. And, you know, it also allows the head to, you know, "flex" and move around.

But yeah, sure, Jerry, sure. You go right on believing that the rear shot is on the right side of the "neck."  HAHAHAHA!

And hit, at a downward angle from a high-rise building, but somehow, "exited" the front of the neck at an upward trajectory. And the rear shot didn't even, you know, end anywhere.

And Connolly, who was actually there unlike these doctors you hold in high esteem - and who was a hunter, to boot - said he heard a shot THEN was hit. You know, Jerry?

--------------

I was raised on the East Coast and like the sea (though I didn't live in a "compound" or have wealth).

So there you go, Jerry. You're biased after all because, what does it matter if they lived on a compound and had wealth and you didn't?

HAHAHAHA!!!

[John Mytton]

"The "back" wound entered "the base of the right side of the neck", per the autopsy report.

    "The other missile entered the right superior posterior thorax above the
     scapula and traversed the soft tissues of the supra-scapular and the
     supra-clavicular portions of the base of the right side of the neck."

HAHAHAHA!!! Sure, Jerry, sure. that's really the base of the neck, alright.  Even Wiki describes what's really the "neck," Jerry:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neck

The neck is, you know, the thing that supports the head. And, you know, it also allows the head to, you know, "flex" and move around.

But yeah, sure, Jerry, sure. You go right on believing that the rear shot is on the right side of the "neck."  HAHAHAHA!

And hit, at a downward angle from a high-rise building, but somehow, "exited" the front of the neck at an upward trajectory. And the rear shot didn't even, you know, end anywhere.

And Connolly, who was actually there unlike these doctors you hold in high esteem - and who was a hunter, to boot - said he heard a shot THEN was hit. You know, Jerry?

--------------

I was raised on the East Coast and like the sea (though I didn't live in a "compound" or have wealth).

So there you go, Jerry. You're biased after all because, what does it matter if they lived on a compound and had wealth and you didn't?

HAHAHAHA!!!

Look closely and pay attention.















And as for Gerald R. Ford, all he did was better match the WC report to the autopsy report.





JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

LN Kook: the Croft photo shows when the back wound occurred.