Would LHO have planned to shoot the president, without also planning an escape? Or did he see something happen on Elm Street that caused him to abandon his escape plan and flee the SBD in panic?
After the shooting, LHO behaved in a confused manner. Walking, bus and taxi took him home, where he grabbed a jacket and pistol, which he could easily have taken to work that morning. He had no disguise prepared, but went back out on the street anyway, leading to his tragic encounter with Officer Tippit, and to his later arrest. If LHO was cool and coldhearted enough to murder a president, why did he fall apart afterwards?
The Mortal Error theory -- that Secret Service agent George Hickey accidentally fired his AR-15 rifle and hit JFK in the head -- may provide an answer.
As the presidential limo continued down Elm Street, LHO was watching thru his telescopic sight. His first shot missed, his second shot hit JFK in the upper back, and, as he was lining up his third shot, he would have seen JFK's skull explode from Hickey's AR-15 shot(s). Instantly, LHO would have known there was another shooter, and that suddenly he was part of something that looked like someone else's assassination plan. He might have felt like a "patsy." The shock of that belief might have sent him into a panic. Thinking he now needed a pistol to defend himself, did he abandon whatever plan he might have prepared, and run helter-skelter for his life?
Oswald stood up & backed away from the window immediately after his shot-2 at Z218. Even tho he had one shot left.
We know that, from Brennan's testimony.
And Oswald knew that Oswald had hit jfk, in the back, at Z218.
And Oswald then saw Hickey blow jfk's head open at Z313.
So, Oswald knew that Hickey had killed jfk.
But, Oswald could not be sure that Oswald had also, or already, killed jfk, ie Oswald could not be sure that his shot-2 would have killed jfk anyhow.
If Oswald thort that his shot-2 was not fatal or potentially non-fatal then Oswald's later actions dont make sense.
If Oswald thort that his shot-2 was non-fatal then why would Oswald shoot Tippit?If Tippit arrested Oswald then Oswald would be facing say a max of 20 years (for the attempted killing of a president out of season without a permit), out in say 15, & would be making millions from a book in say 1978, aged 39.
But he killed Tippit, guaranteeing the electric chair if caught.
Oswald must have had a very good escape plan (worth risking the chair)(compared to risking 20 years), probly the safe house plan, but how good was that?
I think the safe house was not a good plan.
Clearly it was an afterthort.
If it was a proper plan then he would have found some way of placing his junk in the safe house before the shooting, instead of leaving his junk at his boarding house.
It duznt make much sense.
If Oswald stood trial then Hickey would have faced a few years jail for negligent homicide. Out in a year or two. And Hickey then makes millions from his own book.
Oswald was one of only two witnesses who saw Hickey shoot.
No, the second witness was not Holland. Holland saw Hickey stand up & fall with a machine gun in his hands, & praps he saw Hickey shoot, but i dont think that Holland was a witness that could say that Hickey shot jfk in the head.
Oswald was a witness that could say that Hickey shot jfk in the head.