https://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/2024/10/fact-checking-morley-press-conference.html
Thanks for the review. He's really flailing here.
And, quelle surprise, Morley repeats the Win Scott claims made in his (Scott's) manuscript.
Right after the assassination, Scott's top aide/routing officer Anne Goodpasture pored over the photos taken of people entering the Soviet Embassy and selected one she thought possibly may have been Oswald (since he had phoned the Soviet Embassy that day, Tuesday, October 1). The CIA station, e.g., Goodpasture, didn't know what Oswald looked like. As she later said, that was a mistake to do since it was obviously not Oswald. But again, she didn't know at that early stage what Oswald looked like.
If they were "closely monitoring" Oswald as Scott claimed and had taken numerous photos of him then why would Goodpasture send a photo that's clearly not Oswald to Dallas? Why not send the supposed photos that Scott said they made? But as she said, at that time she didn't know what Oswald looked like. The same Oswald that Scott claimed to have been "closely monitored" while in Mexico City?
Shorter: Scott was making it up.