Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Fred Litwin

Author Topic: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.  (Read 8232 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3801
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #64 on: January 03, 2025, 11:52:01 PM »
Advertisement
I don't know how tall Secret Service agent John Howlett was, but the 11/27/63 reenactment photo shows him sitting on your beloved box (apparently in its correct position) and assuming a shooting position similar to what the "Oswald" actor does in "The Lost Bullet" for the 2nd and 3rd shots, so I guess it's plausible that 5' 9" Oswald fired those shots while sitting on it with one bun on and one bun off, just like Howlett was doing as he was pretending to shoot.

More importantly, given the fact that we now know that Oswald fired his first, missing-everything, shot at hypothetical "Z-124," (half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133) and we know that the window was only about 1/3 open (going from memory here), that Oswald had to stand and awkwardly lean forward while firing the steeply-downward-angled shot, and that this is corroborated by the fact that in a digitally enhanced clip from the Robert Hughes film which is embedded in "The Lost Bullet," we can see something light-colored (LHO's t-shirt?) moving in the window about five seconds before the first shot rang (or banged, boomed, or popped?) out.


I don't know how tall Secret Service agent John Howlett was, but the 11/27/63 reenactment photo shows him sitting on your beloved box (apparently in its correct position) and assuming a shooting position similar to what the "Oswald" actor does in "The Lost Bullet" for the 2nd and 3rd shots, so I guess it's plausible that 5' 9" Oswald fired those shots while sitting on it with one bun on and one bun off, just like Howlett was doing as he was pretending to shoot.

There is no reason to assume the seat box was in the correct position in the Howlett photo. In fact it appears to me to not be correct but slightly further away from the window.

Here is a photo from a similar angle to the Howlett photo that shows a model of the box in the correct position. Compare that with the Howlett photo as you wish.





Here is a couple of photos showing how the sniper could sit straight up while firmly on the seat box. He and his rifle are concealed by the wall and the boxes from Hughes' camera angle.






The next three photos show that the sniper only had to raise the rifle up to his shoulder and aim his three shots. This takes very very little time to do. The three targets are Z160, Z224, & Z313.








Here is an over-the-shoulder photo showing three labeled targets at their proper angles from the position of the rifle in the window.




Any shots earlier than Z160 would have been very awkward but not impossible from a sitting position. Plus, the window box and the metal conduit both become potential interference. I simply do not believe he would have taken an earlier shot intentionally.



More importantly, given the fact that we now know that Oswald fired his first, missing-everything, shot at hypothetical "Z-124," (half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133) and we know that the window was only about 1/3 open (going from memory here), that Oswald had to stand and awkwardly lean forward while firing the steeply-downward-angled shot, and that this is corroborated by the fact that in a digitally enhanced clip from the Robert Hughes film which is embedded in "The Lost Bullet," we can see something light-colored (LHO's t-shirt?) moving in the window about five seconds before the first shot rang (or banged, boomed, or popped?) out.

We do not "know" any of those things. Your opinions are not facts. Here is a screenshot from "JFK: The Lost Bullet" showing the sniper's nest window just before the shots. The light colored stack of boxes are in the middle (horizontally) of the window. If the sniper was standing his white shirt would be well above the 1/4 open bottom portion of the window. If he was seated it would be seen in the open portion to the camera right of the boxes. Personally I think I see something in the open portion. But it is definitely not definitive enough to say for certain.



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #64 on: January 03, 2025, 11:52:01 PM »


Online Tom Mahon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #65 on: January 04, 2025, 12:36:25 AM »

There is no reason to assume the seat box was in the correct position in the Howlett photo. In fact it appears to me to not be correct but slightly further away from the window.


It doesn't matter to me whether or not the seat box was accurately placed in the reenactment. I have no problem with Oswald's having sat on it while firing his 2nd and 3rd shots if it was physically possible for him to do so.

What's important is that Oswald's standing (and awkwardly leaning forward) for his first, missing-everything shot through the slightly open window is indicated by 1) the conscious reactions of several of the witnesses to the sounds of the first shot which indicate that it was fired at "Z-124" -- thereby making it steeply-downward-angled, 2) the digitally enhanced Hughes film, where the standing sniper (Oswald) can be seen moving in the Sniper's Nest window about five seconds before he started shooting, 3) the fact that several of the witnesses said the first shot sounded muffled or "different" from the other two, and 4) the ejection pattern of the three shells found on the Sniper's Nest floor.

I'm afraid your notion that the first shot was fired at Z-160 is mistaken.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2025, 01:12:05 AM by Tom Mahon »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3801
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #66 on: January 04, 2025, 01:44:14 AM »
I don't care whether or not the seat box was accurately placed in the reenactment. I have no problem with Oswald's having sat on it while firing his 2nd and 3rd shots if it was physically possible for him to do so.

What's important is that Oswald's standing (and awkwardly leaning forward) for his first, missing-everything shot through the slightly open window is indicated by 1) the conscious reactions of several of the witnesses to the sounds of the first shot which indicate that it was fired at "Z-124" -- thereby making it steeply-downward-angled, 2) the digitally enhanced Hughes film, where the standing sniper (Oswald) can be seen moving in the Sniper's Nest window about five seconds before he started shooting, and 3) the ejection pattern of the three shells found on the Sniper's Nest floor.

I'm afraid your notion that the first shot was fired at Z-160 is mistaken.


The seat box was in the way of a standing or kneeling sniper. Therefore it was not feasible for anyone to stand in that position to shoot.

I didn’t say that I thought the shot was fired at Z160. Although there is significant evidence that it could have been. You should be able to see in my photos that the sniper has to sit up straighter to get higher even for a shot at Z160. A shot from a seated position earlier than Z160 would take even more contortions plus the interference of the window box becomes more likely.

Contrary to your opinions, there is no credible evidence that the sniper was standing for a first shot. The timing evidence only suggests a possible early shot. I haven’t seen any evidence that suggests a standing sniper in the window in the Hughes film. The ejection pattern evidence is interesting but no where near enough to be convincing.

It appears to me that if there was an early shot, it was most likely inadvertent. That might explain why it missed the entire limo. On the other hand, if it had been an intentional standing early shot as you contend, I would expect that the awkwardness could affect accuracy. But I do not believe that the awkwardness alone would be likely to affect accuracy enough to completely miss the limo.

It is your prerogative to believe whatever you wish to believe. I frankly couldn’t care less. I do suggest however that you present your opinions as opinions instead of trying to present your opinions as facts.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #66 on: January 04, 2025, 01:44:14 AM »


Online Tom Mahon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #67 on: January 04, 2025, 01:50:23 AM »

The seat box was in the way of a standing or kneeling sniper. Therefore it was not feasible for anyone to stand in that position to shoot.


I didn't say Oswald or anyone else was standing there.

Regardless, I wonder if you realize I think Oswald stood and leaned forward awkwardly for his first shot, and that he either sat on your box or kneeled for his second and third shots?

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3801
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #68 on: January 04, 2025, 02:20:49 AM »
I didn't say Oswald or anyone else was standing there.

Regardless, I wonder if you realize I think Oswald stood and leaned forward awkwardly for his first shot, and that he either sat on your box or kneeled for his second and third shots?


Do you believe that there was enough space available for a sniper to stand somewhere else besides where the box was positioned? If so, please show us exactly where that space was supposed to be.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #68 on: January 04, 2025, 02:20:49 AM »


Offline Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1410
    • SPMLaw
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #69 on: January 04, 2025, 03:42:33 AM »
The echoing of the three muzzle blasts and the three supersonic "cracks" created a cacophony of sound which fooled many witnesses into believing two of the three shots were close together.
Oh.  I didn’t realize you were there.

Online Tom Mahon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #70 on: January 04, 2025, 07:37:25 AM »

Do you believe that there was enough space available for a sniper to stand somewhere else besides where the box was positioned? If so, please show us exactly where that space was supposed to be.


It looks to me as though there was enough room for Oswald to either:

1) Stand and lean forward near your beloved seat box for his steeply-downward-angled 1st shot at hypothetical "Z-124," and then kneel down for his 2nd and 3rd shots, or

2) to sit rather uncomfortably on your beloved seat box (one bun on / one bun off) and shoot at Z-160 (LOL), at Z-222 -224, and, of course, at Z-313.


https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1317#relPageId=509

« Last Edit: January 04, 2025, 07:50:32 AM by Tom Mahon »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3801
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #71 on: January 04, 2025, 01:27:27 PM »
It looks to me as though there was enough room for Oswald to either:

1) Stand and lean forward near your beloved seat box for his steeply-downward-angled 1st shot at hypothetical "Z-124," and then kneel down for his 2nd and 3rd shots, or

2) to sit rather uncomfortably on your beloved seat box (one bun on / one bun off) and shoot at Z-160 (LOL), at Z-222 -224, and, of course, at Z-313.


https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1317#relPageId=509


I doubt that there is enough room for that. And I suspect that is why Max didn’t include the seat box in his demonstration. This might be worth further study. I will have to decide later. But first I think that you need to know that the photo you chose, CE 1301, is a recreation that the DPD arranged two days after the assassination. And the recreation isn’t exactly accurate. The window boxes are noticeably further west than where they were located during the assassination. Correcting this error would definitely reduce the space available for standing/kneeling.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire the three shots.
« Reply #71 on: January 04, 2025, 01:27:27 PM »