Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.

[Patrick Davies]

The theory that the first shot hit the traffic light post and ricocheted down the road seems very compelling.

[Tom Mahon]

The theory that the first shot hit the traffic light post and ricocheted down the road seems very compelling.

Or hit the asphalt pavement next to the limo at hypothetical "Z-124," which is what the 2020 study by Roselle and Scearce suggests, and that James Tague down by the triple underpass was nicked by a bullet fragment from the fatal head shot.

[Royell Storing]

The theory that the first shot hit the traffic light post and ricocheted down the road seems very compelling.

   There is ZERO Evidence of a shot hitting the signal light/support arm, street, etc. ZERO. Which is right there with the SBT. That's what 1 shooter gets you. Fairy Tales. Rep Luna will soon put ALL of this to bed with the 2 Shooters.

[Tom Mahon]

There is zero evidence of a shot hitting the street, which is right there with the SBT. That's what one shooter gets you. Fairy Tales. Representative Luna will soon put all of this to bed with the two shooters.

There is zero evidence that you are a rational person, Storing.

Vladimir Putin cherishes your you-know-what for the nation-rending tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theories you promulgate.

Question: Does he pay you, or do you do it for free?

[Lance Payette]

   There is ZERO Evidence of a shot hitting the signal light/support arm, street, etc. ZERO. Which is right there with the SBT. That's what 1 shooter gets you. Fairy Tales. Rep Luna will soon put ALL of this to bed with the 2 Shooters.

Do some reading about the aptly-named Rep. Luna-tic and you might have a changed perspective. The likelihood that she has any inside scoop on the JFKA is nil. She is fairly attractive though, and that's what's important.

Max Holland disagrees about the traffic signal assembly: https://d7922adf-f499-4a26-96d4-8ab2d521fa35.usrfiles.com/ugd/d7922a_44c78e12584949128ebeda1d1a49f9c2.pdf.

[Royell Storing]

Do some reading about the aptly-named Rep. Luna-tic and you might have a changed perspective. The likelihood that she has any inside scoop on the JFKA is nil. She is fairly attractive though, and that's what's important.

Max Holland disagrees about the traffic signal assembly: https://d7922adf-f499-4a26-96d4-8ab2d521fa35.usrfiles.com/ugd/d7922a_44c78e12584949128ebeda1d1a49f9c2.pdf.

   Again, ZERO Evidence regarding the traffic light, et al. This was cooked up to sell 44 minutes to Nat Geo/"The Lost Bullet" and extended the elapsed 3 shot firing time to 10.2 seconds. (Which has since been expanded to 12+ seconds). Oh yeah. And the Elm St position of the JFK Limo has been moved too. Knott Lab Forensic SCIENCE and the finding that the SBT, "Is IMPOSSIBLE" is Evidence. And give Luna her time at bat. "Mighty Casey" just might do something.

[Andrew Mason]

   Again, ZERO Evidence regarding the traffic light, et al. This was cooked up to sell 44 minutes to Nat Geo/"The Lost Bullet" and extended the elapsed 3 shot firing time to 10.2 seconds. (Which has since been expanded to 12+ seconds). Oh yeah. And the Elm St position of the JFK Limo has been moved too. Knott Lab Forensic SCIENCE and the finding that the SBT, "Is IMPOSSIBLE" is Evidence. And give Luna her time at bat. "Mighty Casey" just might do something.

I disagree that there is zero evidence that a bullet struck the traffic light or its support. There is actually less than zero evidence. 

Zero evidence would still make it possible just not verifiable.  But here there is abundant evidence that the first shot struck JFK and was well after the time JFK passed beneath the traffic light.  There is consistent independent evidence that the first shot was between z186 and z202. The evidence of the 1.........2.....3 shot pattern with the last two shots in rapid succession also conflicts with an early missed first shot. This evidence is evidence that the traffic light shot did not happen, which can be considered negative (less than zero) evidence that it did.

So that means the 10.2 second time frame is based on less than zero evidence.

I would also say that there is less than zero evidence for the second shot SBT for the same reasons.  However, where we seem to disagree is whether there was more than one shooter.  I suggest that the evidence does not exclude all three shots, three hits and a single shooter: Oswald.  In fact, I suggest that the evidence as a whole compels such a conclusion.

[Tom Mahon]

I disagree that there is zero evidence that a bullet struck the traffic light or its support. There is actually less than zero evidence. 

Zero evidence would still make it possible just not verifiable.  But here there is abundant evidence that the first shot struck JFK and was well after the time JFK passed beneath the traffic light.  There is consistent independent evidence that the first shot was between z186 and z202. The evidence of the 1.........2.....3 shot pattern with the last two shots in rapid succession also conflicts with an early missed first shot. This evidence is evidence that the traffic light shot did not happen, which can be considered negative (less than zero) evidence that it did.

So that means the 10.2 second time frame is based on less than zero evidence.

I would also say that there is less than zero evidence for the second shot SBT for the same reasons.  However, where we seem to disagree is whether there was more than one shooter.  I suggest that the evidence does not exclude all three shots, three hits and a single shooter: Oswald.  In fact, I suggest that the evidence as a whole compels such a conclusion.

Whether Oswald's first, missing-everything shot glanced off the traffic signal's mast arm at hypothetical "Z-107" or hit the asphalt pavement at hypothetical "Z-124" (it very likely was one or the other), the fact remains that you, sir, are full of high-fructose beans.