Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Marjan Rynkiewicz, James Hackerott

Author Topic: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.  (Read 35661 times)

Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 945
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #536 on: February 20, 2025, 08:11:51 PM »
Advertisement
The theory that the first shot hit the traffic light post and ricocheted down the road seems very compelling.
Read my postings. I nailed everything.
Oswald's first shot ricochet offa the signal guy rod was at pseudo-Z105 or a little later.
The bullet casing broke in half as allways, & both halves were found in the limo.
The ricochets down the road were from SSA Hickey's accidental auto burst at Z300 to Z312.
Tague got hit by Hickey's first shot.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #536 on: February 20, 2025, 08:11:51 PM »


Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1481
    • SPMLaw
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #537 on: February 20, 2025, 11:53:59 PM »
Whether Oswald's first, missing-everything shot glanced off the traffic signal's mast arm at hypothetical "Z-107" or hit the asphalt pavement at hypothetical "Z-124" (it very likely was one or the other), the fact remains that you, sir, are full of high-fructose beans.
If anyone was full of high-fructose beans and you are right, it was those 80+ witnesses who flatulated the evidence of three shots, three hits, the first hitting JFK, the second hitting JBC in the back and third and last hitting JFK in the head. But you are the one who smelled it first, so..... 

Online Tom Mahon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 374
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #538 on: February 21, 2025, 12:01:28 AM »
If anyone was full of high-fructose beans and you are right, it was those 80+ witnesses who flatulated the evidence of three shots, three hits, the first hitting JFK, the second hitting JBC in the back and third and last hitting JFK in the head. But you are the one who smelled it first, so.....

Eighty-plus witnesses said they thought the first shot hit JFK, or that they had heard what they thought was firecracker explode a few seconds before JFK (and JBC) were hit by said "first shot"?
« Last Edit: February 21, 2025, 01:22:52 AM by Tom Mahon »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #538 on: February 21, 2025, 12:01:28 AM »


Online Tom Mahon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 374
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #539 on: February 21, 2025, 01:27:52 AM »
If anyone was full of high-fructose beans and you are right, it was those 80+ witnesses who flatulated the evidence of three shots, three hits, the first hitting JFK, the second hitting JBC in the back and third and last hitting JFK in the head. But you are the one who smelled it first, so.....

I haven't read many of your other garbage posts on this thread, so let me ask you -- do you think three shots were fired at JFK and that the first one hit him in the throat around Z-220, the second one hit JBC in the back a split-second later, and the third one hit JFK in the front of the head, the side of the head, or . . . gasp . . . the back of the head at Z-313?

If so, given the fact that three shells were found on the Sniper's Nest floor, how many bad guys do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important COVER UP?

Oodles and gobs?
« Last Edit: February 21, 2025, 02:42:51 AM by Tom Mahon »

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1481
    • SPMLaw
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #540 on: Today at 01:56:51 AM »
I haven't read many of your other garbage posts on this thread, so let me ask you -- do you think three shots were fired at JFK and that the first one hit him in the throat around Z-220, the second one hit JBC in the back a split-second later, and the third one hit JFK in the front of the head, the side of the head, or . . . gasp . . . the back of the head at Z-313?

If so, given the fact that three shells were found on the Sniper's Nest floor, how many bad guys do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important COVER UP?

Oodles and gobs?
I think you should read my posts and stay away from the high fructose beans epithets.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #540 on: Today at 01:56:51 AM »


Online Tom Mahon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 374
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #541 on: Today at 02:01:48 AM »
I think you should read my posts and stay away from the high-fructose beans epithets.

They aren't epithets.

They're descriptions.

Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 945
Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #542 on: Today at 09:36:33 PM »
I think you should read my posts and stay away from the high fructose beans epithets.
Oligosaccharides: Beans contain oligosaccharides (like raffinose and stachyose), which are complex sugars that the human body lacks the enzymes to break down. When these sugars reach the large intestine, they are fermented by gut bacteria, producing gas as a byproduct.5 May 2020

An oligosaccharide (/ˌɒlɪɡoʊˈsćkəˌraɪd/;[1] from Ancient Greek ὀλίγος (olígos) 'few' and σάκχαρ (sákkhar) 'sugar') is a saccharide polymer containing a small number (typically three to ten[2][3][4][5]) of monosaccharides (simple sugars). Oligosaccharides can have many functions including cell recognition and cell adhesion.[6]

They are normally present as glycans: oligosaccharide chains are linked to lipids or to compatible amino acid side chains in proteins, by N- or O-glycosidic bonds. N-Linked oligosaccharides are always pentasaccharides attached to asparagine via a beta linkage to the amine nitrogen of the side chain.[7] Alternately, O-linked oligosaccharides are generally attached to threonine or serine on the alcohol group of the side chain. Not all natural oligosaccharides occur as components of glycoproteins or glycolipids. Some, such as the raffinose series, occur as storage or transport carbohydrates in plants. Others, such as maltodextrins or cellodextrins, result from the microbial breakdown of larger polysaccharides such as starch or cellulose.


Fibre (eg raffinose) creates gas due to fermentation in the large intestine (in everyone).
Raffinose, that is a funny name. Raffi-nose. LOL.

Fructose can cause gas for very rare individuals that cannot digest fructose very well (in which case fermentation occurs in the large intestine)(producing gas).
Likewize lots of kinds of things can cause gas for individuals that have digestive issues (re that there thing) in the small intestine (resulting in fermentation in the large intestine).

Me myself i eat carnivore (animal based fats & proteins etc)(ie food)(real food).
Carnivores like myself know that beans etc (eg plant based starches & sugars)(& plant based oils)(& to some extent plant based proteins) are not real food (they are faux-food).
« Last Edit: Today at 09:41:34 PM by Marjan Rynkiewicz »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.
« Reply #542 on: Today at 09:36:33 PM »