JFK Assassination computer analysis video!

[Tom Graves]

Apparently your standard is different for believing that Oswald did it.

How many bad guys do you figure were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important cover up, Iacoletti?

Oodles and gobs?

[Patrick Davies]

If only a small, elite group planned and did the assassination (eg, rogue intelligence operatives, organised crime guys, or military people), the number of people with direct foreknowledge could be as low as 5 to 10.
This would include planners, shooters, and key facilitators who ensured security gaps, logistics, or cover-up efforts.

If multiple groups were involved (eg, intel agencies, mob connections, and political insiders), the number of people with some foreknowledge would increase to around 10 to 30.
This could include backchannel operatives, bribed officials, and key personnel ensuring media control or evidence manipulation.

This can be seen in someting like Operation Neptune Spear in 2011 when they killed bin Laden: known to only a small group of 5 to 10 high-ranking US officials, a few Navy SEALs, and CIA operatives before execution. Even White House was unaware.

CIA/Mafia plots against Castro involved a handful of CIA operatives and mob figures like Sam Giancana and Johnny Roselli, but information eventually leaked.

Iran/Contra... about 20 or 30.

[Tom Graves]

If only a small, elite group planned and did the assassination (eg, rogue intelligence operatives, organised crime guys, or military people), the number of people with direct foreknowledge could be as low as 5 to 10.
This would include planners, shooters, and key facilitators who ensured security gaps, logistics, or cover-up efforts.

If multiple groups were involved (eg, intel agencies, mob connections, and political insiders), the number of people with some foreknowledge would increase to around 10 to 30.
This could include backchannel operatives, bribed officials, and key personnel ensuring media control or evidence manipulation.

This can be seen in someting like Operation Neptune Spear in 2011 when they killed bin Laden: known to only a small group of 5 to 10 high-ranking US officials, a few Navy SEALs, and CIA operatives before execution. Even White House was unaware.

CIA/Mafia plots against Castro involved a handful of CIA operatives and mob figures like Sam Giancana and Johnny Roselli, but information eventually leaked.

Iran/Contra... about 20 or 30.

Why aren't you unwilling to accept that a sharpshooting, psychologically disturbed, self-described Marxist (who had probably been sent to Moscow in 1959 by a KGB "mole" in the CIA as an ostensible "dangle" in a planned-to-fail hunt for "Popov's U-2 Mole" -- the mole who sent LHO to Moscow!!! -- in the wrong part of the CIA and who lived two blocks from a KGB school in Minsk for two-and-one-half years) killed JFK all by himself by firing three shots at him over 10.2 seconds in the echo chamber known as Dealey Plaza?

[Patrick Davies]

I merely answered your question: How many needed to be in on a plot, if there were one? Given examples of known plots, the answer was about 5 to 30

If we knew the facts for certain, this forum would not exist. 

[Tom Graves]

I merely answered your question: How many needed to be in on a plot, if there were one? Given examples of known plots, the answer was about 5 to 30

If we knew the facts for certain, this forum would not exist.

Why do you think John Armstrong felt it was necessary to create his complicated "Harvey and Lee" theory?

To "fit together" certain seemingly contradictory bits of evidence so that "innocent" Lee Harvey Oswald could be seen by gullible tinfoil-hat conspiracy theorists as having been "patsied" by the bad guys, right?

Do you think Oswald was "patsied" by the bad guys?

If so, how do you think the bad guys did that?

Did they have to forge a lot of documents, etc?