Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[Tim Nickerson]

I don't know if Frazier never told this story earlier, but let's go with 2013 being the first time he told the story publicly.

What do you say, Tim, does the fact that he did not tell it sooner somehow mean it's not true and it never happened?

Is that a yes from you as well? We are going to go by what he said that year and forward?

[John Iacoletti]

Is that a yes from you as well? We are going to go by what he said that year and forward?

Where is this leading?  Does this contradict anything he said prior to 2013?

[Tim Nickerson]

Now you're playing Bill Brown word games.  You misrepresented the truth by leaving out the part of the quote that undermines your argument.

"Frazier said that it was possible this was the case, but he did not think it resembled it."

I'm not playing word games at all. I said that Frazier stated that it was possible that it was the same case. That's all I said. There is no untruth in that.

[Tim Nickerson]

Where is this leading?  Does this contradict anything he said prior to 2013?

Why not just answer the question with a yes or no?

[Bill Chapman]

Now you're playing Bill Brown word games.  You misrepresented the truth by leaving out the part of the quote that undermines your argument.

"Frazier said that it was possible this was the case, but he did not think it resembled it."

That's right. Frazier definitely did not see Oswald carrying a bag covered in fingerprint powder.

A lot of 'could haves' in this case. Or in other words 'cannot totally dismiss'

[John Iacoletti]

Why not just answer the question with a yes or no?

It's a loaded question.  Of what relevance is the year that the interview took place if it doesn't contradict something he said earlier? How does that equate to "we are going to go by what he said that year and forward"?

[John Iacoletti]

That's right. Frazier definitely did not see Oswald carrying a bag covered in fingerprint powder.

Yeah, because fingerprint powder turns flimsy and crinkly paper into thick wrapping paper.

 

[Martin Weidmann]

LOL. Are you now switching ponies and claiming the investigators competent?

Re Truly, I didn't make that up. Perhaps you need to drill down rather deeper into your 'research'
And are you claiming all employees in the building were fingerprinted?

Are you now switching ponies and claiming the investigators competent?

I'm not switching anything and I have come across the claim about Truly before. It was a pointless comment back then and still is today.

Truly's objections would have been worthless if the investigators wanted to fingerprint everybody in the building.