Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[John Mytton]

I have, never needed the stub.

Ok, that's your honest experience and I respect that but if we never needed the stub then why do they tear the ticket in half and give us back the stub?

Btw what happened to me being a waste of time? It's kinda like when you said in the long gone Caprio thread that you were going to leave and you did for a while, what happened?

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Quote me or move on.

I just expected you to be honest, my mistake?
Anyway, your last recorded post before your lengthy hiatus was at the same time that Caprio was erased and the same time you had a massive dummy spit, just another coincidence?

JohnM

[Steve Howsley]

Very stupid move by Duncan indeed.

The best decision Duncan's made all year. It revitalized the board.

[Rob Caprio]

Go through my history and see multiple examples of where I post evidence, whereas your history just shows ideas and opinions.

Well you're the Master at "Naked Assertions" you had a massive series full of Personal Opinion and sickening Disinfo and I'm glad they're gone

JohnM

😀😁😂🤣😃😄😅😆😉

When are you ever going to cite for your claims? Naked assertions don't cut it.

You're lying. No one includes links and cites to the evidence if they are spreading disinformation. Just look at the LNers posts for examples of this.

[Rob Caprio]

Hahaha right on schedule, when you have no answers out comes the bait and switch and again you don't let me down.

But anyway I will quickly go off topic with this powerfully incriminating evidence of Oswald's money order that was determined by at least two expert panels to be written by Oswald!



JohnM

The sample is too small to conclude anything. How could LHO purchase this money order when he was at work and there is no evidence showing how he would get there? Finally, it was shown that the number on the money order was not in circulation at the time of the alleged purchase.

[John Iacoletti]

You don't need to shout and who's Mytton, I'm "Mytton"

So you've given up on defending her bizarre statement that she was by herself yelling for help for 5-10 minutes.

I pointed out how she gave first aid, it's only your desperation that is showing.

a) you haven't shown any evidence that she "elevated Tippit's head and comforted him" as you claimed

and

b) you haven't even shown how doing that would equate to trying to save someone's life

Double fail.

How do the transcripts show someone trying?

So Bizarre Helen M. just yelled into the radio speaker.  Plausible (for her).

The vent window was open. Markham assumed the window was rolled down, how does that impact her testimony?

Just another notch in her unreliability belt.

What, plain clothes Policemen don't exist?

Of course they do.  And the reason they do is so that people won't assume they are police officers.

As your above list shows, your self serving interpretation of what is bizarre is nothing of the sort.

I'll take that as a big "no" on trying to defend your assertion that Roger Craig made bizarre claims.

Triple fail.

[John Iacoletti]

Oh, please. Give it up already. Do we really need to go over this again ?

Who are you trying to fool?  "Again"?  How about for the first time?

The evidence you claim doesn't exist is presented to you, then you try to dispute the evidence, then you go back to claiming it doesn't exist.

You haven't presented FA as evidence that Oswald owned C2766, other than some vague reference to similar order forms that actually don't prove anything.

Is there a single piece of evidence in the case that you accept ?

The evidence is the evidence.  I don't accept your handwaving, speculative, conclusions about what the evidence means.

There's no evidence you accept, you spend your entire time here insinuating that every piece of evidence is tainted or fabricated, yet at the same time claim you're not suggesting a conspiracy to frame Oswald.

Or do I have that wrong ?

You never get anything right.

What little physical evidence there is in this case that actually implicates Oswald is questionable, arguable, impeachable, or tainted in some way.  We spend a lot of time in this forum discussing why this is the case.  Your solution to this quandry is to insult people and insist that you are correct nonetheless.

What evidence against Oswald do you accept ?

Why don't you try naming some first.  Evidence that actually shows that Oswald shot JFK.  Howard Brennan's belated identification, and ....what else?

Do you think there was a conspiracy to frame Oswald ?  If so, name some names already.

A conspiracy to frame Oswald before the fact?  No, I haven't seen any compelling reason to believe that.

Does that somehow prove that Oswald did it?

Should we start with Johnny Brewer ?

I've never accused Brewer of conspiring to frame Oswald.

[John Iacoletti]

Brewer saw someone who was avoiding the Police then the Police find the same someone who has a gun and then tries to kill them with it, thank god for Brewer.

"Tries to kill them with it".  Oh my, you are full of unsubstantiated accusations aren't you?

Thanks for reinforcing that Oswald must have snuck into the theater.

Sorry, still unproven.

Well John, when you kill people you get arrested.

Get a grip.  There was ZERO evidence of him killing anybody at the time they arrested him and you know it.  Even by your bogus evidentiary standards.