Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[John Mytton]

The entire narrative of Oswald as soon as he left the Depository immediately after the assassination is only indicative of guilt. But the Texas Theater is perhaps the most damning because the evidence cannot be disputed and hence the absurd attempts at refutation.

Oswald was observed avoiding cops.
Oswald snuck into the Theater.
Oswald punched a police officer.
Oswald was carrying a revolver.
Oswald tried to use the revolver.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Hurts that Brewer's alert and swift reaction resulted in Saint Patsy's apprehension, eh Johnny ?

Has you spinning like a top trying to explain why Brewer suspected your client.

Sucks being you.

Wrong on all three counts.  How'd you become so delusional?

[John Iacoletti]

How about you explain it?  Even if Brewer's suspicion was unfounded in your subjective opinion, what possible difference would it make as to Oswald's guilt in a trial or otherwise?  Brewer's suspicion only led to his arrest.  The only relevance that discussion has is if you or your contrarian sidekick are alleging that Brewer's suspicion was a product of a conspiracy (i.e. Brewer was part of the plot to frame Oswald and somehow your fantasy conspirators conveniently ensured that Oswald walked down his street and recruited Brewer to point him out).  An absurd premise.

There you go again.  You are simply incapable of making a response that doesn't include a strawman argument in it.

[John Iacoletti]

That's right.

Iacoletti is becoming an even bigger idiot as the days go by. Whatever it takes, no matter how preposterous Iacoletti is is prepared to say it if in his alternate universe he thinks he can muddy the waters.
He has no shame.

Those who can't argue the facts and evidence just insult the opposition and hope that nobody else notices.

[John Iacoletti]

The entire narrative of Oswald as soon as he left the Depository immediately after the assassination is only indicative of guilt. But the Texas Theater is perhaps the most damning because the evidence cannot be disputed and hence the absurd attempts at refutation.

Oswald was observed avoiding cops.

No, Oswald was observed looking in a window.  Everything else was conjecture.

Oswald snuck into the Theater.

Nobody observed Oswald sneaking in to any theater.

Oswald punched a police officer.

Possibly he took a swing in self-defence.  But it's disputed who threw the first punch.

Oswald was carrying a revolver.

Also disputed.  Only Nick "captor of Oswald" "serial teller of falsehoods" McDonald ever claimed to see a revolver on Oswald at the theater.

Oswald tried to use the revolver.

Also conjecture.  There was a click or a snapping noise at a time when several hands were on the gun and it was pointed at a 45 degree angle toward the screen.

But exactly none of these claims, even if they happen to be true (and you haven't demonstrated them to be anything but empty claims), tell you anything about who killed Kennedy or Tippit.

[John Mytton]

No, Oswald was observed looking in a window.  Everything else was conjecture.

Nobody observed Oswald sneaking in to any theater.

Possibly he took a swing in self-defence.  But it's disputed who threw the first punch.

Also disputed.  Only Nick "captor of Oswald" "serial teller of falsehoods" McDonald ever claimed to see a revolver on Oswald at the theater.

Also conjecture.  There was a click or a snapping noise at a time when several hands were on the gun and it was pointed at a 45 degree angle toward the screen.

But exactly none of these claims, even if they happen to be true (and you haven't demonstrated them to be anything but empty claims), tell you anything about who killed Kennedy or Tippit.

So again you attack the eyewitnesses who were actually there and saw the events with their own eyes and then attempt to insert your own narrative. WOW!

JohnM

[Steve Howsley]

No, Oswald was observed looking in a window.  Everything else was conjecture.

Nobody observed Oswald sneaking in to any theater.

Possibly he took a swing in self-defence.  But it's disputed who threw the first punch.

Also disputed.  Only Nick "captor of Oswald" "serial teller of falsehoods" McDonald ever claimed to see a revolver on Oswald at the theater.

Also conjecture.  There was a click or a snapping noise at a time when several hands were on the gun and it was pointed at a 45 degree angle toward the screen.

But exactly none of these claims, even if they happen to be true (and you haven't demonstrated them to be anything but empty claims), tell you anything about who killed Kennedy or Tippit.

So much rubbish in one post. An excellent example of Iacoletti's shameless lies.

If Oswald had gone to trial I would have loved for someone just like him to have defended Oswald. The killer would have been fried quicker than a bucket of chicken.

[Martin Weidmann]

So much rubbish in one post. An excellent example of Iacoletti's shameless lies.

If Oswald had gone to trial I would have loved for someone just like him to have defended Oswald. The killer would have been fried quicker than a bucket of chicken.

So much rubbish in one post. An excellent example of Iacoletti's shameless lies.

Please tell us all what exactly are the lies and provide prove for your claim that they are indeed lies.....


If Oswald had gone to trial I would have loved for someone just like him to have defended Oswald. The killer would have been fried quicker than a bucket of chicken.


Oh no... not another LN who thinks he can predict what would have happened at a trial and bases his arguments on that.... please, say it ain't so