Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 140366 times)

Offline John Anderson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #16 on: January 07, 2018, 09:48:28 PM »
Advertisement
His sister initially said it was about 3 feet by 6 inches. Then it shrunk.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #16 on: January 07, 2018, 09:48:28 PM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #17 on: January 07, 2018, 09:49:48 PM »
His sister initially said it was about 3 feet by 6 inches. Then it shrunk.

You don't know this for a fact.

It was Bookhout who wrote that in an internal FBI report, which Linny Mae never read or signed.

Offline John Anderson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #18 on: January 07, 2018, 10:00:24 PM »
You don't know this for a fact.

It was Bookhout who wrote that in an internal FBI report, which Linny Mae never read or signed.

Well it's unlikely she chose to reveal she had seen Oswald carrying a lunch sack that morning.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #18 on: January 07, 2018, 10:00:24 PM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #19 on: January 07, 2018, 10:07:30 PM »
Well it's unlikely she chose to reveal she had seen Oswald carrying a lunch sack that morning.

It is not really of any importance what you consider to be unlikely....

By the time she testified before the WC Frazier was no longer in danger of being considered a suspect or co-conspirator.

Can you think of one reason for Linnie May to nevertheless lie in her testimony under oath about the size of a paper bag?
« Last Edit: January 07, 2018, 10:16:36 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline John Anderson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #20 on: January 07, 2018, 10:13:14 PM »
She lied to protect her brother. Then she lied for the rest of her life to protect her integrity.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #20 on: January 07, 2018, 10:13:14 PM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #21 on: January 07, 2018, 10:15:06 PM »

She lied to protect her brother. Then she lied for the rest of her life to protect her integrity.


Really?  And you know this how? You wouldn't just be giving us your biased opinion, would you?

And what about Buell Frazier.... he still stands by his first day testimony to this day. Is he lying also?
« Last Edit: January 07, 2018, 10:17:29 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline John Anderson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #22 on: January 07, 2018, 10:25:38 PM »
Call it biased opinion. Call it logic. Whatever. Makes no odds anyway. Unless one chooses to believe Oswald didn't take a rifle into the TSBD.

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #23 on: January 07, 2018, 10:37:08 PM »
Call it biased opinion. Call it logic. Whatever. Makes no odds anyway. Unless one chooses to believe Oswald didn't take a rifle into the TSBD.

Oh but it makes odds. This is some logic for you;

Without the paper bag being big enough you have no way to demonstrate that Oswald ever took a rifle into the TSBD.

So I guess you just choose to believe that Oswald brought the rifle into the TSBD regardless of the fact that there isn't a shred of evidence for it...

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #23 on: January 07, 2018, 10:37:08 PM »