Buell Wesley Frazier

[Tom Sorensen]

At least!

And yet STILL no one can say!

How about you, Tom?

Oodles and gobs, right?

Say what?

[Tom Graves]

Say what?

Is English your second language?

[Tom Sorensen]

Is English your second language?

Correct. You needed something from me?

[Tom Graves]

Correct. You needed something from me?

Yes -- I could use a good laugh!

Regarding the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, on November 22nd, 1963, how many bad guys do you think were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the cover up?

Lots and lots?

[Tom Sorensen]

Yes -- I could use a good laugh!

Regarding the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, on November 22nd, 1963, how many bad guys do you think were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the cover up?

Lots and lots?

The Warren report itself, consisting of 888 pages of lies and deception, is the best evidence of a cover-up pinning the murder on Oswald. If Oswald acted alone all along, there would be no need for a cover-up, so we know a conspiracy at some level was real. This is basic stuff.

Seven WC members signed off on the report, plus assistant counsel to the commissions, who were instrumental in putting together the report. LBJ formed the commission to block out any other investigation (he saw Hoover was in panic mode), so I'd say easily 20 in the government cover-up department.

I don't know about the planning and patsy part of the deal. What I can say is that both Frazier and Oswald were planted at the TSBD, as Truly didn't need staff at the time they were hired. I couldn't say if Truly was simply told by management to hire them or if he was part of the setup; Shelley would evidently have known that hiring the two rookies was nuts. At least somebody at this level connected to the TSBD was pulling strings to place Frazier and Oswald there.

[Tom Graves]

The Warren report itself, consisting of 888 pages of lies and deception, is the best evidence of a cover-up pinning the murder on Oswald. If Oswald acted alone all along, there would be no need for a cover-up, so we know a conspiracy at some level was real. This is basic stuff.

Seven WC members signed off on the report, plus assistant counsel to the commissions, who were instrumental in putting together the report. LBJ formed the commission to block out any other investigation (he saw Hoover was in panic mode), so I'd say easily 20 in the government cover-up department.

I don't know about the planning and patsy part of the deal. What I can say is that both Frazier and Oswald were planted at the TSBD, as Truly didn't need staff at the time they were hired. I couldn't say if Truly was simply told by management to hire them or if he was part of the setup; Shelley would evidently have known that hiring the two rookies was nuts. At least somebody at this level connected to the TSBD was pulling strings to place Frazier and Oswald there.

It sounds as though you've been fully indoctrinated.

[Tom Sorensen]

It sounds as though you've been fully indoctrinated.

It sounds more as though you should have read the report before replying.

[Michael Capasse]

Here's a graphic from Dr. Tony Fratini  - I consider this proof of Oswald not having carried in the rifle that morning.
It is Frazier - the one and only guy in the whole world that saw Lee carry the package from the palm of his hand to his armpit.
Yes, he claimed he wasn't paying much attention to the bag. But he was sure of how Lee carried it. He never said he was mistaken.



So what is Frazier's mistake? The rifle is 34.8" long - it can be no shorter. About the length of a lady's nine iron (golf club).
Are we expected to believe that? At the point that Lee was 50 ft. ahead, Frazier mistakenly did not see the package rise above the shoulder.
And if that was all there was wrong with any connection he might have to the bag, then there should be other evidence to build upon.

Witnesses are questionable. - the first 11 officers never saw the bag. Fingerprints and fiber evidence in the bag are garbage.
All that is left are Nutter excuses of "where are the curtain rods?" "where is the lunch?" as some sort of proof.
But evidence after evidence breaks down and fails. LN makes excuses of, we know he must've because of everything else.
"must-a-done-its", the entire case is filled with them, and every one them is based on nothing, but to fill in the broken evidence.

There is no need for any conspiracy theory. Just look at the completely failed case against the accused time after time.
And look for the Nutters excuses when I say, "...there is no reason to believe that rifle was ever broken down or put into that bag...."

https://jfk.boards.net/post/7400/thread