Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Steve M. Galbraith, Richard Smith, Jack Nessan

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 171185 times)

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #448 on: March 06, 2025, 01:09:49 PM »
Advertisement

At least you understand a 27 inch package does not match the description of what Linnie Mae saw LHO carrying. It could only be the 42 inches length she originally estimated.
Sorry I don't - a shorter length does not refute what she saw. I think I said that at least 3 times now.

Actually, I don't know what you are arguing anymore.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #448 on: March 06, 2025, 01:09:49 PM »


Online Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1028
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #449 on: March 06, 2025, 02:14:54 PM »
Sorry I don't - a shorter length does not refute what she saw. I think I said that at least 3 times now.

Actually, I don't know what you are arguing anymore.

Well here let me refresh it for you. We weren’t arguing, at least four times I have explained a 27-inch bag cannot be carried in the manner Linnie Mae Randle described. It is simply true. You side stepped, changed the subject, and evaded the whole issue without ever explaining how LHO could have carried it in the manner she described without having been bent over at the waist. In turn it called into question BWF’s recounting of the length of the package which led you down a dark path about BWF with Fritz being at the center of the story of a conspiracy.

Does that help? If you want to ignore it then ignore it, but it will not make the issue go away. Funny how such a simple little detail, the bag being carried barely above the ground and the left hand supporting it down low, can define the whole event.

Online Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1028
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #450 on: March 06, 2025, 02:36:03 PM »
The information I provided is factual. It's on record. You fell flat on your face again.

Thanks for the update. I did not know you had provided any worthwhile information at all.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #450 on: March 06, 2025, 02:36:03 PM »


Offline Michael Capasse

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #451 on: March 06, 2025, 02:39:52 PM »
Well here let me refresh it for you. We weren’t arguing, at least four times I have explained a 27-inch bag cannot be carried in the manner Linnie Mae Randle described. It is simply true. You side stepped, changed the subject, and evaded the whole issue without ever explaining how LHO could have carried it in the manner she described without having been bent over at the waist. In turn it called into question BWF’s recounting of the length of the package which led you down a dark path about BWF with Fritz being at the center of the story of a conspiracy.

Does that help? If you want to ignore it then ignore it, but it will not make the issue go away. Funny how such a simple little detail, the bag being carried barely above the ground and the left hand supporting it down low, can define the whole event.

How is he bent over? - if the package is shorter - he holds in the manner she had seen.
How does a shorter package restrict the way he held it, if he can reach both portions
One hand near the top -  the other for support at the bottom. I seriously don't understand your point.

It is certainly is NO proof the package is longer than about 2 feet. 
« Last Edit: March 06, 2025, 02:48:44 PM by Michael Capasse »

Online Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1028
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #452 on: March 06, 2025, 02:49:15 PM »
Why does Lee have to carry the package in the same manner as seen by LMR?

You are kidding me, right? Was someone else carrying a package that morning?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #452 on: March 06, 2025, 02:49:15 PM »


Offline Michael Capasse

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #453 on: March 06, 2025, 02:53:39 PM »
You are kidding me, right? Was someone else carrying a package that morning?

 :D It has been corrected.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2025, 02:56:31 PM by Michael Capasse »

Online Tom Sorensen

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #454 on: March 06, 2025, 04:47:22 PM »
Thanks for the update. I did not know you had provided any worthwhile information at all.

I'm aware that facts don't worry you too much, so how would you have noticed? Carry on. ROFL.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4495
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #455 on: March 06, 2025, 09:22:59 PM »
ROFL, the photo shows it's not there. Either Studebaker or Day took the photo. They both took multiple shots of the same scene; only the best was entered into evidence. You need to deal with the facts.

Quote
You need to deal with the facts.

It looks like I'm the only one dealing with the facts!

1) Oswald makes a trip to Irving for the first time ever mid-week on Thursday.
2) Just by chance?, President Kennedy is passing by Oswald's work place the very next day.
3) Oswald for the first time ever brings a long package to work, he tells Frazier it contains "curtain rods"
4) Oswald immediately upon arrival at Frazier's hides the package in the back seat of Frazier's car then goes back to wait for Frazier.
5) Oswald for the first time ever, walks ahead of Frazier increasing the gap as they walk to the Depository.
6) Oswald's rifle is found on the 6th floor.
7) A long bag is found with Oswald's prints.
8} No "curtain rods" are ever found.
9) Oswald's fresh prints are found in the sniper's nest and Oswald's fresh prints are found on the rifle rest boxes, which were moved half way across the 6th floor. And even though he does indeed work there, it's not his job to touch every box every few days.
10) Oswald for some reason known only to him, decides to leave within 3 minutes of the President being shot.
11) No one who sees Oswald thereafter says that Oswald was carrying a long brown package, odd considering that Oswald specifically made the unscheduled trip to Irving for "curtain rods".
12) "Curtain rods" were not found in Oswald's room and as a matter of fact his room didn't even need "curtain rods"
12) Oswald lies to interrogators about what was in the brown paper package.
13) Oswald lies to interrogators about where in Frazier's car he stored the package.

These Tom my good friend are just some of the facts in this case, and so far not one CT is willing to deal with these facts, why is that?

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #455 on: March 06, 2025, 09:22:59 PM »