Prayer Woman

[Alan Ford]

Leaving aside all the speculative assumptions that have to be made to come close to some kind of plausibe narrative, please tell us what exactly is this "stack of evidence of his guilt".

It would be nice if at least one LN would support such a bold claim rather than just claiming it.

Don't hold your breath, Mr Weidmann! They have had 55 years to put Mr Oswald at that window at that time with that rifle, and they still come up short every time.

Speaking of plausible narratives: the official implausible narrative now, for the first time in those 55 years, finds itself confronted with a simple, concrete and plausible counter-narrative:



Courtesy of Mr Oswald himself

[Alan Ford]

The Coca cola was not brought up in the first interrogation, and that's the ONLY interrogation that Hosty attended.

More unadulterated nonsense from Mr Cakebread 

Agent Hosty co-signed the first report on Mr Oswald's first interrogation which contains the words:

Oswald stated that he went to lunch at approximately noon and claimed he ate his lunch on the first floor in the lunch room; however he went to the  second floor where the coca cola machine is located and obtained a bottle of coca cola for his lunch. Oswald claimed to be on the first floor when President John F. Kennedy passed the building.

[Royell Storing]

       The Hosty Notes which mention Oswald claiming to go outside and "Watched the P. Parade" are written on the Back Side of a DPD Affidavit Form. According to SA Bookhout's WC testimony, he was NOT on duty on 11/22/63. He was "On leave". Bookhout was physically there in Dallas and watched the JFK Motorcade pass by that day. When he was told by a passerby that shots had been fired, he called in and was at some point was directed to be on hand at the Oswald 3:15 Interrogation. Is it possible with SA Bookhout being "On Leave" that he was Not carrying his FBI Note Pad with him? Bookhout Not having his FBI Note Pad with him probably forced him to write down his Oswald Interrogation Notes on whatever paper was on hand = the Back Side of a DPD Affidavit Form. This would make these Notes to be the Original Bookhout Notes taken During the Oswald 3:15 Interrogation.

[Walt Cakebread]

       The Hosty Notes which mention Oswald claiming to go outside and "Watched the P. Parade" are written on the Back Side of a DPD Affidavit Form. According to SA Bookhout's WC testimony, he was NOT on duty on 11/22/63. He was "On leave". Bookhout was physically there in Dallas and watched the JFK Motorcade pass by that day. When he was told by a passerby that shots had been fired, he called in and was at some point was directed to be on hand at the Oswald 3:15 Interrogation. Is it possible with SA Bookhout being "On Leave" that he was Not carrying his FBI Note Pad with him? Bookhout Not having his FBI Note Pad with him probably forced him to write down his Oswald Interrogation Notes on whatever paper was on hand = the Back Side of a DPD Affidavit Form. This would make these Notes to be the Original Bookhout Notes taken During the Oswald 3:15 Interrogation.

Yes, I believe your right....I recall Bookhout saying that he jotted his notes on the back of a pad of DPD affidavit forms that he found in the Homicide office.

But I believe that the Bookhout notes are from the second interrogation ...... Hosty never recorded anything about the Coca- Cola, because that never came up in the first session.   That first session ended at 4:05 and Hosty was ordered to stay out of the interrogation because he had caused Lee to become angry by mentioning Mexico City...

[Royell Storing]

Yes, I believe your right....I recall Bookhout saying that he jotted his notes on the back of a pad of DPD affidavit forms that he found in the Homicide office.

But I believe that the Bookhout notes are from the second interrogation ...... Hosty never recorded anything about the Coca- Cola, because that never came up in the first session.   That first session ended at 4:05 and Hosty was ordered to stay out of the interrogation because he had caused Lee to become angry by mentioning Mexico City...

    What Hosty may or may not have recorded is immaterial. What we are looking at are Original Notes recorded when heard. Most likely recorded by Bookhout.

[Walt Cakebread]

    What Hosty may or may not have recorded is immaterial. What we are looking at are Original Notes recorded when heard. Most likely recorded by Bookhout.

While I agree that the notes are the notes written by Bookhout ...., That does not mean that they are !00% accurate....  Lee's movements inside the TSBD didn't come up during the first interrogation.... And Bookhout simply misunderstood what Lee said.   Lee had gone to the second floor to get a coke to drink WITH HIS LUNCH.... So he wouldn't have gone out front with the coke....He returned to the Domino room with his coke just as Bookhout recorded in his notes....And I doubt that he walked through the office area and passed by Mrs Reid .....  The shortest route to the Domino room from the second floor lunchroom was down the stairs and across the ist floor to the domino room....  However there was a shorter route if the back door of the lunchroom wasn't locked.....

[Walt Cakebread]

    YOU are Not a handwriting expert. SA Bookhout's WC Testimony supplies the Facts that explain why the Oswald 3:15 Interrogation was recorded on the Blank Side of a DPD Affidavit. Facts are Facts. Get over it

Doyly can't capitulate....He lacks the character to admit the truth, and LEARN.....His ego keeps him from advancing his knowledge and keeps him ignorant...

[Royell Storing]

Doyly can't capitulate....He lacks the character to admit the truth, and LEARN.....His ego keeps him from advancing his knowledge and keeps him ignorant...

    Some of these guys are ALL about saving face instead of solving this assassination one issue at a time.