So, no, the autopsy doesn't prove the SBT impossible.
.....
I'm sure one of the geniuses here that claim the SBT is an impossibility has a logical answer.
I agree that the autopsy does not disprove the SBT. What disproves the SBT the trajectory, are the following:
1. the 20+ witnesses who said that JFK reacted to the first shot (not by smiling and waving for 3 seconds but by assuming a blank look, moving to the left, reaching for his neck/chest);
2. the 20+ witnesses who placed the first shot after z191 (eg. Betzner, Hughes, bystanders along Elm, occupants of the VP car who said that they had completed the turn - it is still turning at z191, similarly for VP security and Cabell cars, etc.);
3. the 40+ witnesses who distinctly recalled that the last two shots were closer together and in rapid succession;
4. the individual witnesses like Greer, Hickey and Altgens who put the second shot after z255; and
5. Tague, who said he was struck on the second shot. That is inconsistent with the second shot SBT. Greer said he sensed a "concussion" on the second shot and turned around immediately, which supports a strike on the windshield frame on that second shot.
There is nothing in the evidence or the zfilm that conflicts with this 1.....2...3 shot sequence. All three shots struck occupants in the car. There was no missed shot.
According to the evidence, the first shot struck JFK and went to JBC's left side, the second shot struck JBC in the right armpit and fragmented striking the radius and fragments deflected off the radius striking the windshield and frame and at least one fragment clearing the windshield and striking the curb near Tague. The third shot struck JFK in the head at z313.
That is the only explanation that fits the evidence. And the evidence is perfectly consistent with all shots having been fired by Oswald with the MC rifle from the 6th Floor window of the TSBD.