Autopsy proves SBT impossible

[John Iacoletti]

Thanked his lucky stars when he wasn't held at the TSBD.

Assumes facts not in evidence.

Made sure he wasn't caught at home.

Assumes facts not in evidence.

Panicked and shot Tippit, the poor dumb cop.

Assumes facts not in evidence.

Panicked at the TT

Assumes facts not in evidence.

That's it. It's all over now.

Assumes facts not in evidence.

[Bill Chapman]

edit

[Bill Chapman]

You can count Rachel out too.

Not unlike you and other LNers on this forum, Uncle Vinnie mistook arrogance for truth.

Your boy would fry, son

[Ray Mitcham]

Your boy would fry, son

Like many innocent people in the past.

[John Iacoletti]

Your boy would fry, son

Sadly, these crap one-liners are the only thing Chapman has got.  Anything to avoid actually talking about the evidence.

[Bill Chapman]

Sadly, these crap one-liners are the only thing Chapman has got.  Anything to avoid actually talking about the evidence.

Crybaby

You lot are silly and highly mockable

I've come to my conclusion
No need to seek your approval

This case is a slam dunk
Your boy would fry, son

 

[John Iacoletti]

Crybaby

You lot are silly and highly mockable

I've come to my conclusion
No need to seek your approval

This case is a slam dunk
Your boy would fry, son

I'm not crying, nor is he my boy, or me your son.  Condescension doesn't make your claims any more compelling.

It's easy to come to a conclusion.  Justifying it is a different matter.  If the answer is "faith", then why don't you just say so?

Here's another question you will avoid like the plague: 

what about this case makes it a "slam dunk"?

[John Iacoletti]

The CT mantra

Empty posturing is your mantra.