Non problematic evidence?

[Martin Weidmann]

Jerry,

On it's own, CE-399 doesn't tell us much of anything. It has to be coupled with at least one other piece of evidence to have any evidentiary value. The same goes with pretty much all of the evidence. And that's why I haven't bothered responding to the OP.

So, basically you agree that there is not one single piece of physical evidence conclusively tied to Oswald which is of such significance that it beyond reasonable doubt clearly points to his guilt?

Could it actually be your position that all there really is are some individual pieces of physical evidence which perhaps can be tentatively linked to Oswald in some creative manner and require support from other similar pieces to construct a mere circumstantial case by making assumptions?

[John Iacoletti]

What did I tell you!

- A nonspecific reference to Bugliosi's "53".

[John Iacoletti]

Jerry,

On it's own, CE-399 doesn't tell us much of anything. It has to be coupled with at least one other piece of evidence to have any evidentiary value. The same goes with pretty much all of the evidence. And that's why I haven't bothered responding to the OP.

It has no evidentiary value no matter what you couple it with.

[Martin Weidmann]

What did I tell you!

Yes, Mytton is so predictable.

[John Iacoletti]

Could it actually be your position that all there really is are some individual pieces of physical evidence which perhaps can be tentatively linked to Oswald in some creative manner and require support from other similar pieces to construct a mere circumstantial case by making assumptions?

That's pretty much the entire case against Oswald in a nutshell.

[Martin Weidmann]

That's pretty much the entire case against Oswald in a nutshell.

Agreed. Let's see if there is somebody who can prove us wrong!

Obviously, if they can't the case against Oswald is lost by default except perhaps for some die hard LNs and those who believe Disneyland is a real country.

[Jerry Freeman]

  It is worthless

Yeah... ...was as close as I could come to 'tongue in cheek'

[John Iacoletti]