Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Non problematic evidence?  (Read 31174 times)

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2018, 02:23:55 AM »
Advertisement
Amazing!

Is there really no LN who can name one piece of physical evidence conclusively tied (or even just tentatively, yet convincingly) linked to Oswald that is so credible it points to his guilt?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2018, 02:23:55 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #17 on: April 28, 2018, 03:35:45 PM »
He left his wedding ring at home.


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #18 on: April 28, 2018, 07:06:38 PM »
He left his wedding ring at home.



That's it... It's all over now.

Poor dumb cop, eh John...
« Last Edit: April 28, 2018, 07:08:16 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #18 on: April 28, 2018, 07:06:38 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #19 on: April 29, 2018, 01:44:27 AM »
Amazing!

Is there really no LN who can name one piece of physical evidence conclusively tied (or even just tentatively, yet convincingly) linked to Oswald that is so credible it points to his guilt?

Name one LNer who claims any one piece of evidence, on it's own, would convict.

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #20 on: April 29, 2018, 01:52:10 AM »
Name one LNer who claims any one piece of evidence, on it's own, would convict.

Where did I use the words "would convict"?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #20 on: April 29, 2018, 01:52:10 AM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #21 on: April 29, 2018, 05:23:10 AM »
... evidence ...doesn't exist. 🤣

Hi RC...
I know. Have you ever read this book called the Bastard Bullet by a guy named Marcus?
He completely destroyed the SBT.
JF

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #22 on: April 29, 2018, 02:39:11 PM »
Where did I use the words "would convict"?

You might as well have
« Last Edit: April 29, 2018, 11:26:39 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #23 on: April 29, 2018, 05:12:54 PM »
Hi RC...
I know. Have you ever read this book called the Bastard Bullet by a guy named Marcus?
He completely destroyed the SBT.
JF

Marcus never destroyed the SBT at all. He muddled the numbers and facts of the real SBT and then proceeded to destroy a SBT of his own creation. He didn't waste any time before presenting his false data either. From page 1 of "The Bastard Bullet":

"The Commission contends that this bullet, after having been fired from the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle from the sixth-fioor window of the Texas School Book Depository, struck President Kennedy in the back at a point 5-3/8 inches below the top of his coat collar,"


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #23 on: April 29, 2018, 05:12:54 PM »