"The Dallas Police found Oswald's Carcano"
Actually a 7.65 Mauser was found by Sheriff Department Deputy Boone. The crime scene
was turned over to the (DPD) Dallas Police Department almost immediately. The rifle later became Ozzie's
Carcano.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50a4d/50a4dfe23ae9432925bc365b980a99782a15d693" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aada8/aada8f6d1b8c69e8ebd327afbae98d18bfc72211" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e2fd/6e2fd4bbb037a890ea81a80f43bf0c5ec51d7b6d" alt=""
You are quoting an error caused by Deputy Sheriff Boone's cursory "look" at the rifle before it was examined. Boone later admitted his error: he assumed the rifle was a "Mauser" based on the bolt-action.
Like every other amateur attorney: you have no interest in explaining the whys and wherefores of the Mauser theory. Even the most obvious, rudimentary questions are never asked.
-- Was the German Mauser used to make the assassination shots?
-- Where is the ballistics evidence that links a German Mauser to the assassination shots?
-- Why was Oswald's Carcano unavailable to make the assassination shots?
-- How did Oswald's Italian Carcano appear very soon after the Boone "find" for Captain Fritz and Lieutenant Day to examine the rifle?
-- Were Fritz and day part of a conspiracy to murder JFK? Before the fact? After the fact?
Well Mister defense attorney?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac96f/ac96facccd836fefe222e9bfb6143b264f465eb5" alt="Huh? ???"
?