Bullet hole in windshield on JFK's Limo

[Patrick Jackson]

If you take that van into consideration, there are good chances that the pictures were taken in the same garage while the limo moved from one spot to another so there are at least four photos from that garage (same garage, two limo positions).
Is there a record on where the White House Garage is/was? I was trying to find it on the White House plan but no GARAGE anywhere. Suppose it was outside White House complex? Any other pictures of the White House garage?

And here is the MOST interesting part: if bellow two pictures were taken in the same garage (based on the van and hat on the wall), note the mud on the back wheel!!!
Limo was drove in in front of the van, no mud on the back wheel:

Then it was driven who knows where outside the garage and when drove back in the same garage on the different spot, there is mud on the back wheel:

There is not much importance on the mud but who knows what was done with the limo considering proper investigation and evidence collection.

[Mark Connors]

Yeah, that's what I thought.

Amazing.  Provide nothing and then just claim you already provided it.  Just like the evidence in the JFK case.  Clearly.

I can't link the conversation, because it was prior to the recent forum crash. But you made reference that the package in BWF's back seat is a few inches away from BWF, when it, in fact, would have been closer to a few feet. Dishonesty is your MO.

You stated something, and when someone calls you out on your dishonesty you start your twisting.

Dishonesty at its finest.

[Royell Storing]

And here is the MOST interesting part: if bellow two pictures were taken in the same garage (based on the van and hat on the wall), note the mud on the back wheel!!!
Limo was drove in in front of the van, no mud on the back wheel:

Then it was driven who knows where outside the garage and when drove back in the same garage on the different spot, there is mud on the back wheel:

There is not much importance on the mud but who knows what was done with the limo considering proper investigation and evidence collection.

     A perfect example of the FBI ineptness is their "examination" of the JFK Limo. The Official Photos taken of the JFK Limo immediately following the assassination were taken with the Front Visors in the DOWN position. As we know, the Limo traveled down Elm St with the Front Visors in the UP position/portions of which extended Above the Limo Windshield. When we see those Visors in the Official Photos, we are seeing the side of the visors which faced Outward as the Limo traveled down Elm St. Those photos give us No Idea as to the condition of the side of the Visors that were facing the Inside of the JFK Limo as the "Flurry" of shells and "Sawdust" material rained down on ASAIC Kellerman and the entire front section of the Limo.   

[John Iacoletti]

I can't link the conversation, because it was prior to the recent forum crash. But you made reference that the package in BWF's back seat is a few inches away from BWF, when it, in fact, would have been closer to a few feet. Dishonesty is your MO.

You stated something, and when someone calls you out on your dishonesty you start your twisting.

Dishonesty at its finest.

Oh brother....and you guys accuse me of nitpicking.  Yes, I underestimated the distance.  How does that make me "dishonest"?Now can you explain how that makes a difference in Frazier's ability to see how much of the back seat the package took up?

Compare that with somebody who knowingly makes a false statement like "the rifle in the backyard photo was proven to be C2766".

[Mark Connors]

Oh brother....and you guys accuse me of nitpicking.  Yes, I underestimated the distance.  How does that make me "dishonest"?Now can you explain how that makes a difference in Frazier's ability to see how much of the back seat the package took up?

Compare that with somebody who knowingly makes a false statement like "the rifle in the backyard photo was proven to be C2766".

The dishonesty bit comes in when you are challenged on an exaggeration to make a point, but refuse to admit it at the time.

But, thank you, for acknowledging it now.

As much as I would like to discuss the other questions and statements above, I think we should stop the thread highjack here.

[John Iacoletti]

The dishonesty bit comes in when you are challenged on an exaggeration to make a point, but refuse to admit it at the time.

But, thank you, for acknowledging it now.

As much as I would like to discuss the other questions and statements above, I think we should stop the thread highjack here.

I think I acknowledged it at the time too, but whatevs.

[Mike Orr]

Bobby Hargis was splattered with blood and brain matter and he was behind and left of the rear of JFK's limo .

[Jerry Freeman]

Mike Orr.....Mr. George Whitaker said that the original windshield , with the bullet hole in it , had been broken up and scrapped---as ordered---after the new windshield had been made.
 Jack Trojan .....Who ordered that?
  Matt Grantham.....Jack, The short answer is Whitaker's superiors at the Ford Motor Company The link below provides some interesting material on how one of episodes of The Men Who Killed Kennedy, presented by the History channel was pulled after it's first airing, and how Bill Moyer's and others, insisted the episode be removed and apparently some of the footage regarding the window is no longer available to the public It always just becomes a bigger and bigger outrage.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2012/06/douglas-p-horne/photographic-evidence-of-bullet-hole-in-jfk-limousine-windshield-hiding-in-plain-sight/

The long answer is Lyndon Baines Johnson did.