He may well have done, although I doubt it, but Brown's OP contains only part of the whole story and can not be relied upon.
For instance, Helen Markham testified she left home at "a little after 1". She had only one block to walk, yet according to the official story Tippit was shot at around 1.14 pm. That means that, for the official story to be true, Markham would have taken some 10 minutes to walk one block. Anything less than that would have placed her well beyond 10th/Patton prior to the shooting. Obviously, if the shooting happened earlier, it's just about impossible for Oswald to have been there on time to do the deed.
William Scoggins's testimony reveals that his timing was off and that he got to 10th/Patton earlier than the official story claims. Also, Scoggins, who is supposed to have identified Oswald at the DPD line up failed to identify Oswald as Tippit's killer to the FBI from a photo shown to him the very next day.
Domingo Benavides, who was closer to the actual shooting than anybody else, refused to participate in a line up because he felt he could not positively identify the killer, yet others, like the Davis sisters, who were indoors somehow can identify the man? Really?
There are so many things Brown doesn't tell you, that his entire OP is just a one sided dishonest presentation of what he wants to be the truth rather than the truth itself.
Domingo Benavides, who was closer to the actual shooting than anybody else,
refused to participate in a line up because he felt he could not positively identify the killer,Do you remember Helen Markham....She didn't want to go to view a line up...Did she have a choice? Benavides was closer to the killer by a half block than Markham and he looked the killer right in the eye... But the cops would have us believe that Benavides REFUSED because he felt he couldn't
POSITIVELY identify the killer.
Question:.... Isn't that the reason for a police line up??.... To determine if a witness can or cannot identify the suspect in a line up?