I "know all this from our previous discussion"? Laughable. You have no idea where I know "all of this" from.
Anyway, you were wrong about all of that back then just as you are wrong about all of it right now.
Unless, of course, you wish to post it again along with a little extra this time to help make your case.
What BS is this? Why are you being so dishonest? Did you "forget" our conversation about where Callaway was standing when he encountered the man with the revolver running down Patton. That discussion was part of the time line I had prepared and you were desperately trying to extend the time Callaway needed to get to the scene, after the shots, by a few seconds. It's all on this board, so why are you pretending to be ignorant?
Even more so, when you tell me I was wrong
back then. What would that "back then" be, other than the discussion I just mentioned.
And of course you are telling me that I am wrong, because you will never ever agree to anything that does not compute with your fairytale story of the events and you will ever ever honestly discuss or even listen to a coherent narrative build on corroborative witness statements, day 1 documents and factual information.
Unless, of course, you wish to post it again along with a little extra this time to help make your case.Why would I waste my time by posting it again, when we can simple revive the old discussion already on this board. I'll even discuss it with you, by going through it point by point and letting you tell me just how wrong I am. That should be fun....
There's only one condition. You stick with the discussion to the end and do not bail out (just telling me I'm wrong) when you can't present a persuasive argument as you have done several times in the past.