I have said time and time again that the time stamps on the police tapes could be off by as much as forty-five seconds to a minute. I have also said (even in the very recent Youtube interview) that Callaway was at the patrol car three to four minutes after hearinfg the shots. I have also said (even in the very recent Youtube interview) that Callaway's call was at 1:19/1:20.
So what are you going on about again?
Your unwillingness to discuss the actual points I have raised is duly noted.
I have said time and time again that the time stamps on the police tapes could be off by as much as forty-five seconds to a minute. Not sure where you actually said that, but it does not compute with what the man in charge of the DPD dispatchers told the HSCA.
A given operator at a given time might broadcast "time" a little early in one event then a little late the next. Accordingly, a call initiated at, say, 10:10 might be stamped at 10:13 by the dispatcher, only to have intervening radio traffic delay his broadcast. -
J.C. BowlesBut at least we have now established that the DPD time calls can not be relied upon to give the accurate time.
Which computes perfectly with what Bowles said;
There is no way to connect "police time" with "real time." -
J.C. BowlesI have also said (even in the very recent Youtube interview) that Callaway was at the patrol car three to four minutes after hearinfg the shots. I have also said (even in the very recent Youtube interview) that Callaway's call was at 1:19/1:20.Backpeddling?
Anyway, it makes very little difference if Callaway got there 4 minutes after shots (he only needed to run one block, for crying out loud!) and made his call at 1:20. That would still place the shooting at 1:16 PM, which still does not match with the time lines for Benavides and Bowley.
It also does not match with the testimony of Croy, who arrived some 2 minutes after hearing Bowley's 1:17 call and saw Callaway and Bowley put Tippit into the ambulance. Nor does it match with the ambulance itself, which left Jefferson shortly after Bowley's call and got there in about 40 seconds. Didn't you say you can hear the sirens in Callaway's radio call? So, there is no way that Callaway made his call at 1:20. It just doesn't fit.
But, just for fun, let's throw another spanner in your narrative. A while ago I said that you claimed that Benavides was trying to get the mic to work for two minutes and you claimed you had said it was only one minute. I accepted that as my error and let it go, which is why I am quoting you now for the one minute period. However, I just listened to your interview again and in it, at around 42:30 you said; If you listen to the actual police tapes you can hear the mic being keyed, eventhough he never did get through, cause he didn't know how to do it right. It begins at 1:15 and last for about a minute and a half to two minutes".
So, you've got Benavides starting to work the mic at 1:15 (which means the shooting was at least a minute earlier) and it took him 1,5 to two minutes. That might fit in as far as the duration goes with Bowley's account, but if true you now must have Callaway arriving at the scene at 1:14 + 3 minutes, which is 1:17 or at the lastest 1:18. Or, alternatively, you need to argue that Callaway needed 5 minutes to run one block, which the FBI determined would take 2,5 minutes to walk.
In other words, you're all over the place.
But keep going. It's good fun trying to see you wiggle yourself out of this one.
What's it going to be? Are you going to ask what I am going on about again (exposing a total lack of understanding of basic logic) or are you going to present your case in a similar way I have?