Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald admitted it was his revolver.

According to the interrogation reports, Oswald admitted he had carried a revolver, but nowhere in the reports does it say that he was shown the revolver now in evidence or that he identified that particular revolver as the one he had.

"Mytton" likes to make up evidence that isn't actually true.

[John Iacoletti]

'the alleged revolver'

So it wasn't necessarily a revolver... just alleged to be one, huh GrammarBoy.

The allegation was that the revolver known as CE143 ever had anything to do with Oswald.

@Newbies:
The revolver tried to speak for itself, but was muzzled..

How could "newbies" possibly benefit from your useless irrelevancies?

[Bill Chapman]

The allegation was that the revolver known as CE143 ever had anything to do with Oswald.
>>> I know that. How would newbies?

How could "newbies" possibly benefit from your useless irrelevancies?
>>> Translation 101 for CTrolls:
        'The revolver tried to speak for itself, but was muzzled'  =  Oswald was trying to shoot an officer but was prevented from doing so
 

[John Iacoletti]

>>> I know that. How would newbies?

Because “newbies” know more about the case than you do.

As I recall.

>>> Translation 101 for CTrolls:
        'The revolver tried to speak for itself, but was muzzled'  =  Oswald was trying to shoot an officer but was prevented from doing so

This is the Chapman version of epistemology.  Just declare the thing you want to believe as a fact, and it becomes a fact.

Probably.

[Richard Smith]

Oswald admitted it was his revolver.

According to the interrogation reports, Oswald admitted he had carried a revolver, but nowhere in the reports does it say that he was shown the revolver now in evidence or that he identified that particular revolver as the one he had.

LOL.  Somewhere in hell John Wilkes Booth is asking for ice water and enjoying Roger's idiotic nonsense.  Of course if Oswald had been shown the revolver and confirmed it was his, Roger would be on here asking us to prove what was said during his interrogation (i.e. implying those present lied).  On and on it goes down the rabbit hole.

[John Iacoletti]

LOL.  Somewhere in hell John Wilkes Booth is asking for ice water and enjoying Roger's idiotic nonsense.  Of course if Oswald had been shown the revolver and confirmed it was his, Roger would be on here asking us to prove what was said during his interrogation (i.e. implying those present lied).  On and on it goes down the rabbit hole.

Is this your way of agreeing that Oswald didn't actually admit it was his revolver as "Mytton" claimed?

[Martin Weidmann]

Is this your way of agreeing that Oswald didn't actually admit it was his revolver as "Mytton" claimed?

Perhaps somebody can explain to Richard that the self serving assumptions he constantly makes are not evidence or proof of anything.

[John Mytton]

Is this your way of agreeing that Oswald didn't actually admit it was his revolver as "Mytton" claimed?

Geez, what are the chances, Oswald leaves the rooming house and half an hour later he arrives at the Texas Theater but somewhere in between the rooming house and the Texas Theater in the same time period a Cop is killed, the Cop is not killed by a knife or a rifle or with fists or by being run over or whatever, no, the first Dallas Cop shot and killed that year is shot with a revolver which just happens to be of the same type which unlucky Oswald was arrested with and to top it off a stack of eyewitnesses were all fooled into believing it was Oswald when they positively identified him either at or moving away from the Tippit murder scene. And let's not forget Oswald was also at the Texas School Book Depository when Kennedy was shot, this Oswald guy was the unluckiest guy alive.

Now for some reason which eludes me, the Cops who had a mountain of evidence wanted to replace Oswald's revolver which fires virtually unmatchable bullets with another revolver which fires virtually unmatchable bullets, have any of you actually thought this through?
The only person who would use this type of weapon is someone who wanted to evade capture, setting up anyone with this type of weapon when there was a plethora of more suitable alternatives is simply not realistic. And in a similar vein, the only person who would order weapons with Hidell as an alias would be Oswald, for instance why setup John Mytton with the alias John Iacoletti, isn't that just making your conspiracy even more unnecessarily complicated?

JohnM